ShareThis Page

Pitt senior big man Zanna answers questions in ACC play

Kevin Gorman
| Sunday, Jan. 5, 2014, 10:06 p.m.
Pitt's Lamar Patterson (21), Talib Zanna (42) and James Robinson (0) react towards the end of their game against N.C. State on Saturday, Jan. 4, 2014, in Raleigh, N.C.
Pitt's Lamar Patterson (21), Talib Zanna (42) and James Robinson (0) react towards the end of their game against N.C. State on Saturday, Jan. 4, 2014, in Raleigh, N.C.

Talib Zanna knows one of the biggest questions surrounding Pitt's inaugural season in the ACC was whether he could handle the rigors of playing center.

The fifth-year senior, a converted power forward, believes that he had been prepared by the physical play of three seasons in the Big East. Zanna insisted all along he was more ready for the ACC than it was for him.

Then he proved it.

Zanna had 15 points and nine rebounds in Pitt's 74-62 victory at N.C. State on Saturday.

The 6-foot-9, 230-pounder from Nigeria was 3 for 3 from both the field and the free-throw line in scoring nine second-half points as the Panthers turned an eight-point halftime deficit into a double-digit lead.

“That's what you expect,” fellow Pitt fifth-year senior Lamar Patterson said. “Talib's been here just as long as me. He knows what it takes. He's been through every tough game that I've been through. He knows what we have to do to win.”

Zanna made 4 of 6 shots from the field and 7 of 11 free throws while facing a pair of challenges against the Wolfpack, taking turns going up against 7-1, 245-pound center Jordan Vandenberg and 6-9, 325-pound backup BeeJay Anya.

“They keep throwing guys at me,” Zanna said. “I just go out there and do the dirty work.”

Next, Pitt (13-1, 1-0) plays host to Maryland (10-5, 2-0) at 7 p.m. Monday at Petersen Events Center.

For Zanna, who played at Bishop McNamara High School in Forestville, Md., Maryland is as close as it comes to playing against a hometown school.

The Terrapins feature a post pairing of 6-9, 265-pound sophomore Shaquille Cleare and 6-8, 260-pound sophomore Charles Mitchell.

That duo combined for 14 points and 13 rebounds and held Georgia Tech center Daniel Miller to seven points and four rebounds in the Terrapins' 77-61 victory Saturday.

After his scoring average dipped by three points during conference play last season, Zanna made it a point to improve his endurance this summer so he wouldn't wear down this season. He is averaging 12.1 points and 7.6 rebounds a game this season.

With backup Derrick Randall providing only 2.9 points and 3.9 rebounds in limited minutes so far, Zanna knows he will have to handle a heavier workload.

Now, Zanna is faced with a new question: Can he keep it up all season?

“It's a matter of heart, who has it,” Zanna said. “It's not the body. If you have heart, you can bring it every day.”

Kevin Gorman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @KGorman_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.