Share This Page

Pitt visits No. 2 Syracuse for early ACC supremacy

| Friday, Jan. 17, 2014, 11:18 p.m.
Getty Images
Head coach Jim Boeheim of the Syracuse Orange argues the lack of a call following a first half collision at mid court on December 28, 2013 at The Carrier Dome in Syracuse, New York.

Jim Boeheim has been a student, basketball player, team captain and coach at Syracuse, beginning in 1962.

As a player, he teamed with Dave Bing to lead Syracuse to the school's second-ever NCAA Tournament berth. As a coach, he's taken his alma mater to nine Big East regular-season championships, five Big East Tournament titles and 28 NCAA Tournament appearances while advancing to three national title games during three different decades, defeating Kansas for the school's only crown in 2003.

Only Duke's Mike Krzyzewski has more career wins than Boeheim, who earned his 880th win two years ago, surpassing North Carolina's Dean Smith for most career wins at one school.

Syracuse, ranked No. 2, is one of three undefeated teams in the country at 17-0.

Here are some numbers that Boeheim isn't so proud of: He's only 4-10 against Pitt coach Jamie Dixon, who faces Boeheim at 4 p.m. Saturday at Carrier Dome in a renewal of their Big East rivalry that shifted to the ACC this season.

“We've had big games with Pitt every year,” Boeheim said. “They were the best team in the Big East, wins and losses, for the last 10 years, and we were second.”

Coincidentally, Pitt and Syracuse — the new kids on the block in the ACC — are the only remaining undefeated teams in conference play with identical 4-0 records.

Duke was picked as ACC preseason favorite by the media. Syracuse was selected No. 2 and Pitt sixth.

“It's early, it's four games,” said Dixon, whose team is 16-1 overall. “We obviously weren't picked to win the league. I don't think Syracuse was. I don't think they anticipated us being at the bottom of the league (but), I don't think they anticipated us being at the top.”

“We knew we were coming from a great league,” Boeheim said. “We both knew that (Pitt and Syracuse). Players know it, coaches know it. Pittsburgh's been tremendous for years. No one should be surprised where they are.”

Asked to describe the Pitt-Syracuse rivalry, Boeheim replied, “Rivalries are when you have good games. You have two good teams and you have good games. That's what happened over the last 10-15 years with Pittsburgh and Syracuse. Every time we play Pittsburgh it's a big game, and it's a big game this year.”

Last season, Syracuse was a surprise Final Four entrant, losing to Michigan in the national semifinals.

This season, Boeheim is coaching yet another team, led by senior C.J. Fair, with the potential to make a deep tournament run.

“We've played good when we had to,” Boeheim said. “When we've been in tough spots, we've played really well, and we've played well down the stretch in games. That's been the difference.”

Coaching — and winning big — at Syracuse gives Boeheim a deeper appreciation for his accomplishments, which include 937 career wins.

“For me, Syracuse was the right fit,” said Boeheim, 69. “I came here as a walk-on. I was an assistant coach here. If coaches find the right fit, they'll stay. More and more coaches are settling in if they get a good situation. Mike Krzyzewski found his place at Duke. Billy Donovan at Florida found the right place for him. Bo Ryan at Wisconsin. Tom Izzo at Michigan State.

“You can still find a good situation that's comfortable for you, and you stay there.”

Is Dixon, now in his 11th season with nearly 300 career wins, that guy at Pitt?

“Absolutely,” Boeheim said. “He's found a great place and built a tremendous program. I see him coaching at Pittsburgh a long time.”

John Harris is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at jharris@tribweb.com or via Twitter @JHarris_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.