Panthers insider: Pitt shows character in aftermath of Johnson's injury
Georgia Tech could have been a trap game for Pitt, given the distractions around the Panthers.
They returned to the national rankings, a showdown with No. 2 Syracuse for first place in the ACC awaited, and they are without Durand Johnson for the season.
Where some teams are a cast of characters, these Panthers showed by beating the Yellow Jackets, 81-74, that they are a team with character.
“We've been persevering all year,” Pitt junior shooting guard Cameron Wright said. “It's just another obstacle we have to overcome.”
Pitt coach Jamie Dixon knows from experience Johnson's injury could have a positive or negative impact on the Panthers (16-1, 4-0 ACC), who are ranked No. 22 in the Associated Press poll.
In 2007-08, Pitt persevered despite losing senior small forward Mike Cook for the season to an injury similar to Johnson's — a torn ACL and meniscus — against Duke at Madison Square Garden.
The next game, point guard Levance Fields suffered a broken foot against Dayton. Fields returned later that season, leading the Panthers to the Big East Tournament title and the NCAA second round.
But losing point guard Tray Woodall to a groin strain and abdominal tear in December 2011 proved devastating. Pitt lost eight consecutive games, starting Big East play 0-7, and missed the NCAA Tournament for the only time in Dixon's tenure.
“We've had this before — we've had a lot, actually — where we've lost starters in the middle of the year,” Dixon said. “It's happened way too often in the last four or five years. But we've handled it well, for the most part. We've got to limit it to one guy, that's for sure.”
Johnson's case is different.
He's not a starter but was an instant energizer off the bench who was a dangerous 3-point shooter.
After the Georgia Tech game, the Panthers talked about how it would take a team effort to replace not only Johnson's scoring touch but also his infectious enthusiasm.
“We definitely missed Durand,” senior swingman Lamar Patterson said. “We missed his points. We missed his energy. Just the character he brings to the team, we're definitely missing that right now.”
Dixon said he believes the challenge for Pitt will be to overcome his absence by replicating Johnson's passion instead of his point production.
“There's a void, but there can also be a way of inspiring or encouraging,” Dixon said. “Durand's personality is a big part of our team, as well as his basketball attributes. I think we'll fill that vacuum, that hole. I told our guys, ‘I want you talking. I want you playing with passion. That's the only thing you need to do differently.' ”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.