ShareThis Page

Victory over Virginia could boost Pitt's prospects

Kevin Gorman
| Saturday, Feb. 1, 2014, 10:24 p.m.
Pitt head coach Jamie Dixon urges his team against Duke  Monday, Jan. 27, 2014, at Petersen Events Center.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pitt head coach Jamie Dixon urges his team against Duke Monday, Jan. 27, 2014, at Petersen Events Center.

Jamie Dixon knows Virginia runs an offense with similar sets and plays defense with familiar principles, but what the Pitt coach knows most about the Panthers' next opponent is its ACC record and standing.

“We know that they're 7-1, a game ahead of us for second place, and we're right behind them,” Dixon said. “They've played well, and they've gotten better as the year went on.”

Not only does Virginia (16-5, 7-1) stand ahead of Pitt (18-3, 6-2) in the conference standings, but it also represents something larger for the Panthers' postseason hopes entering their ACC game at 12:30 p.m. Sunday at Petersen Events Center.

Virginia is one of Pitt's two remaining foes with an RPI top 25 ranking and one of four ranked in the RPI top 50. The Panthers also play Syracuse on Feb. 12 at home. Syracuse, the No. 1 team in the AP Top 25 poll, is sixth in the RPI.

The Cavaliers (No. 22 RPI) represent a chance for the Panthers to get their first signature victory, one that would improve their resume for NCAA Tournament seeding.

Dixon isn't dwelling on Pitt's lack of success against the RPI top 50, given the Panthers have beaten everyone ranked below them and lost only to three teams with RPI rankings in the top 25.

“This is an opportunity,” Dixon said. “We've lost to three really good teams. Our losses are to Cincinnati, Duke and Syracuse. I don't think anybody has three losses like that, and we've got 18 wins beside it. As coaches and media, we focus together on the losses and the 18 wins are forgotten, but we've put ourselves in a good position.”

Virginia is 0-2 against RPI top 25 teams (Duke, Wisconsin) and 3-4 against the top 50.

The Cavaliers swept their season series with Florida State and beat North Carolina, 76-61, on Jan. 20.

Besides Syracuse, only No. 42 North Carolina, which Pitt visits Feb. 15, and No. 32 Florida State, which plays at the Pete on Feb. 23, have RPI rankings in the top 50. Pitt's lone win over an RPI top 50 team came Nov. 26, an 88-67 victory over Stanford.

“It is what it is,” Dixon said. “You've got to play the best you can, and as many of those games as you can. Would I rather have one of those and 15 wins? No. If that's the substitute, then we've got to continue to do what we did. We lost to three really good teams. That's where we're at. You can only have 21 games at this point. You can't add anyone else in there. That's who we are and what we've done.

“You can't go back. We can go forward, and that's what we're looking to do. We've got to beat a good team, one that has a very good RPI and a very good basketball team who's playing their best basketball, as we have to.”

Pitt's 14-game home winning streak was snapped in an 80-65 loss to Duke on Monday.

“It's good to have those signature wins, but we've got to protect our home court,” Pitt sophomore point guard James Robinson said. “We can't let two games slide like that, especially on our home court.”

Kevin Gorman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @KGorman_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.