ShareThis Page

Pitt notebook: Zanna's ankle injury leads to Virginia surge

Jerry DiPaola
| Sunday, Feb. 2, 2014, 7:06 p.m.

Petersen Events Center became suddenly quiet in the first half of Pitt's 48-45 loss to Virginia on Sunday when senior center Talib Zanna fell to the floor with a left ankle injury.

Zanna was facedown for several minutes before getting to his feet and limping to the bench. He sat out almost five minutes, which turned out to be, perhaps, the costliest stretch of the game for Pitt.

Sophomore Joseph Uchebo (6-foot-10, 260 pounds) replaced Zanna but got caught in a defensive switch, allowing Virginia guard Joe Harris to hit a 3-point shot and break an 8-8 tie.

Uchebo immediately came out of the game.

While Zanna was out, Virginia scored 11 points, nearly one-fourth of its total in a time period that encompassed one-eighth of the game.

“Talib was not the same after the ankle,” Pitt coach Jamie Dixon said. “But we have to have other guys play.

“He seemed to be limping the entire time I watched him play, but he said he was fine. He certainly didn't look as explosive, so it was kind of hard to figure if it was advantageous to have him in there or not have him in there.”

Zanna finished with two points and three rebounds, well below his season averages.

He saw the sign

Virginia coach Tony Bennett used the Oakland Zoo to emphasize how he wanted his team to play against Pitt.

“What signs do you see at the zoo?” he said he asked his players before the game.

“Don't feed the animals.

“What is feeding the animals? Don't give them easy transition buckets.”

Bennett's players responded by rebounding well on the offensive end in the first half (eight) to slow Pitt's fast break.

Couple that with good man-to-man defense throughout the game and the result was Pitt shooting 31.9 percent from the field (second worst this season to a 31.4 effort against Cincinnati on Dec. 17). Pitt shot a season-worst 26.1 percent (6-23) in the second half.

“We shot 31 percent and got outrebounded (33-32),” Dixon said. “Things we build our program on.”

Exhausting the clock

Pitt hit 4 of 11 3-pointers, but two of the makes (by Michael Young and Cam Wright) came at the shot-clock buzzer.

Virginia entered the game leading the ACC in average points allowed (55) and field-goal percentage defense (38.0) in conference games, and Pitt fell short of both marks.

Virginia shot better from the field than Pitt (40.4 percent), but its point total was a low for an opponent this season.

“There just weren't a lot of easy looks out there all game,” Bennett said.


Pitt has dropped consecutive home games for the first time since losing to West Virginia and South Florida on Feb. 16 and 19, 2012. ... The Panthers lost for the first time in 17 games after holding a halftime lead (23-21).

Football visits

Pitt football welcomed 28 prospects to its Junior Day, but the appearance of 2014 quarterback Wade Freebeck was the most important of the afternoon. Freebeck, who verbally committed in June, was accompanied by his parents on his official visit.

He stayed for the entire game before returning home to Fort Lauderdale, Fla., after some recruits left at halftime. He sat with wide receiver Tyler Boyd, offensive coordinator Joe Rudolph and quarterbacks coach Brooks Bollinger.

National letter-of-intent day is Wednesday.

Jerry DiPaola is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.