The Pitt women avenged a loss to Clemson earlier this season with a 56-43 win Sunday in front of 3,305 at Petersen Events Center.
Led by junior Brianna Kiesel with 20 points and sophomore Loliya Briggs with 16, Pitt improved to 11-15 overall and 3-9 in the ACC. It was the seventh annual Pink the Petersen game to raise money and awareness for breast cancer research, and it was also senior day, with Pitt honoring Asia Logan, Marquel Davis and Ashlee Anderson.
A week earlier, the Panthers led Wake Forest at halftime, 40-23, only to lose the game, 74-70. After holding Clemson to eight points until Charmaine Tay hit a pair of free throws with 48 seconds left in the first half and Paige Mosley made a layup, Pitt led at the break, 33-12.
“The first thing (coach Suzie McConnell-Serio said at halftime) was do not let up,” Logan said. “We thought about Wake Forest.”
Clemson (11-16, 3-10) shot 54.5 percent from the field in the first seven minutes of the second half, while Pitt made just one of its first nine attempts and cut Pitt's lead to 38-26, but got no closer. The Panthers shot 50 percent from the 3-point line (9 of 18) and 32.6 percent from the floor (14 of 43) overall.
The Panthers play their final home game of the season on Feb. 27 against N.C. State.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.