Pitt's Wright wins ACC's Skip Prosser Award
Pitt guard Cameron Wright has been named the recipient of the Skip Prosser Award as top scholar-athlete in the ACC, commissioner John Swofford announced Thursday.
A junior business-marketing major from Cleveland, Wright carries a 3.1 grade-point average and is a four-time recipient of the University of Pittsburgh's Scholar-Athlete Award and a two-time recipient of the school's Academic Excellence Award.
Wright has started all 31 games for Pitt (23-8), averaging 10.8 points while shooting 47 percent.
“It's a really great award,” Pitt coach Jamie Dixon said. “In the ACC, they look upon it as the most prestigious award given by the conference. They take great pride in it and we do, too. It says a lot about Cameron, who does great in classroom and is now playing his best basketball.
“I think he's been our most consistent player. There was a stretch where he was our best player when Lamar and Talib were playing with injuries.”
The Skip Prosser Award was created in 2007 to honor the memory of the late George Edward “Skip” Prosser, a Carnegie native who had a 291-146 career record in 14 seasons, including 126-68 in six years at Wake Forest and was 2003 ACC Coach of the Year.
The Demon Deacons graduated every senior he coached and had nine players on the All-ACC Academic team during his tenure.
In order to be nominated for the award, a student-athlete must be an upperclassman with a grade-point average of 3.0 or better – both in his career and in the previous two semesters. Sixty percent of the award is based on academic achievement and 40 percent on athletic accomplishments. Clemson guard Cliff Hammonds (2008), Miami guard Jack McClinton (2009), Virginia center Jerome Meyinsse (2010), North Carolina center Tyler Zeller (2011 and 2012) and Duke's Mason Plumlee (2013) are past Skip Prosser Award recipients.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.