ShareThis Page

Pitt, Colorado overcame big blows during path to NCAA Tournament

| Wednesday, March 19, 2014, 10:36 p.m.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Pitt's Durand Johnson works with his teammates during practice Wednesday, March 19, 2014, at Amway Center in Orlando, Fla.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Pitt's Durand Johnson (right) smiles, as coach Jamie Dixon gathers his team during the Panthers' practice Wednesday, March 19, 2014, at Amway Center in Orlando, Fla.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Pitt's Durand Johnson (left) and James Robinson share a laugh during the Panthers' practice Wednesday, March 19, 2014, at Amway Center in Orlando, Fla.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Colorado junior Spencer Dinwiddie watches his teammates practice Wednesday, March 19, 2014, at Amway Center in Orlando, Fla.
Christopher Horner | Trib Total Media
Pitt's Durand Johnson stays upbeat during a team practice Wednesday, March 19, 2014, at Amway Center in Orlando, Fla.

ORLANDO, Fla. — When Spencer Dinwiddie saw Pitt's Durand Johnson tear an ACL on “SportsCenter” on Jan. 11 against Wake Forest, the Colorado star had no idea that he would suffer the same injury the next day.

Or that their paths would cross two months later.

Pitt and Colorado had to deal with the devastating blow of losing a key player and endure the ensuing midseason slump, then rally to finish strong. The Panthers went 10-8 without their high-energy sixth man. The Buffaloes finished 9-8 without their point guard and top scorer.

They will meet in the NCAA Tournament when No. 9 seed Pitt (25-9) plays No. 8 Colorado (23-11) in a South Region second-round game at 1:40 p.m. Thursday at Amway Center.

When the Panthers lost Johnson, a 6-foot-6 redshirt sophomore who averaged 8.8 points, it not only robbed them of a dangerous 3-point threat who could stretch the floor, but also one who Pitt coach Jamie Dixon said was their best perimeter defender.

Fortunately, Pitt had a pair of fifth-year seniors in Lamar Patterson and Talib Zanna who played through nagging injuries and carried the Panthers to their 12th NCAA tourney appearance in 13 seasons.

“It changed a lot of things and what we wanted to do,” Dixon said. “He was one of our best five players. What we wanted to do was get him on the floor with Lamar. That was probably our best team, putting the four perimeter guys out there and playing that way.”

For Colorado, losing Dinwiddie left his teammates looking for answers and wondering who would elevate his game.

“You had to do it on the fly. It's not like you can call a timeout,” Colorado coach Tad Boyle said. “He was a legitimate first-round pick. To lose that caliber player three games into the conference season was a big blow.

“It wasn't so much his points — he was our leader in scoring and assists — but he was our best perimeter defender and brought a lot of confidence and swagger to our team.

“We recalibrated and figured out how to win games without Spencer. Our margin for error has gone out the window. For us to win games, we have to play well.”

Colorado got double-figure scoring from 6-foot-10 sophomore forward Josh Scott, 6-2 junior guard Askia Booker and 6-7 sophomore swingman Xavier Johnson.

The similarities don't end there. Each coach preaches defense and rebounding, principles that offset losing a scorer. Each ended his regular season with an overtime game, Pitt winning at Clemson and Colorado losing at Cal. Each won two games in his conference tournament before losing to a No. 1 seed (Pitt to Virginia, Colorado to Arizona).

Now they are trying to advance at the other's expense.

“Losing Durand was a big loss, and (Dinwiddie) was their best player,” Patterson said. “They're not on the court, but they're still there. Durand brings energy to this team. He still gets us going, so we click as he clicks. I'm sure they do the same. Just like us, they figured out a way to keep winning and get Ws.”

Kevin Gorman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @KGorman_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.