ShareThis Page

Containing Colorado big man Scott will be key to Panthers' success

| Wednesday, March 19, 2014, 10:50 p.m.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Colorado's Josh Scott dunks during practice Wednesday, March 19, 2014, at Amway Center in Orlando, Fla.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Colorado's Josh Scott goes up a for a shot next to Wesley Gordon during practice Wednesday, March 19, 2014, at Amway Center in Orlando, Fla.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Colorado coach Tad Boyle watches his team practice Wednesday, March 19, 2014, at Amway Center in Orlando, Fla.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Colorado's Askia Booker takes a shot during practice Wednesday, March 19, 2014, at Amway Center in Orlando, Fla.

ORLANDO, Fla. — Entering his first season in the ACC, Pitt coach Jamie Dixon remembers going through rosters and being surprised by the lack of physical, inside presences like his team faces Thursday against Colorado's Josh Scott.

“We didn't face a lot of big-body guys in our conference, as much as I would have thought,” Dixon said Wednesday, preparing for his eighth-seeded team's NCAA opener against ninth-seeded Buffaloes.

The 6-foot-10, 245-pound Scott leads Colorado at 14.1 points and 8.5 rebounds, providing a major challenge for Panthers forward Talib Zanna, a 6-9, 230-pound senior who was slowed by flu symptoms Wednesday but is expected to play against the Buffaloes.

Asked for the closest match to Scott that Pitt has faced this season, Dixon pointed to North Carolina's James Michael McAdoo, who was a big part of the two games split with the Tar Heels this season.

In the first meeting, a 75-71 UNC win, McAdoo had 24 points and 12 rebounds; in the second, an 80-75 Pitt win Friday in the ACC Tournament, he was held to 15 points and seven boards, while Zanna went off for 19 points and a career-best 21 rebounds.

Both teams made the tournament despite losing key players midway through the season. Colorado lost wing Spencer Dinwiddie, its leading scorer and still a potential first-round draft pick, and Pitt lost promising sophomore Durand Johnson.

It's helpful, then, that Scott and Zanna can step outside the paint and show some range. Scott called Zanna “an energetic, athletic, hard-nosed big man,” comparing him to Arizona's talented freshman Aaron Gordon, who helped the Wildcats to three wins against Colorado.

Both teams got lost nationally in the second tier of deep conferences — Pitt (25-9) took fifth in the ACC, its only win against a ranked team coming against UNC last week, while Colorado (23-11) was stuck in a five-way tie for third in the Pac-12, with solid wins against two top-10 opponents in Kansas and Oregon. Thursday's opener — leading to a showdown Saturday likely with top-seeded Florida — is a chance to provide one of the opening weekend's biggest upsets.

While the point guard matchup of Colorado's Askia Booker and Pitt's James Robinson can't be overlooked, Dixon spoke highly of Scott. Dixon said his biggest threat is as a rebounder, especially on the offense end — McAdoo had seven offensive boards when UNC beat the Panthers — and said containing him there will be the biggest test.

“They'll both put it down on the floor. They're both big bodies,” Dixon said. “Their offensive rebounds are our biggest concern. ... Scott, obviously the leading scorer, a big that plays inside-out, that's a big concern.”

Greg Auman is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.