ShareThis Page

Panthers have eye on upsetting top-seeded Florida

Kevin Gorman
| Friday, March 21, 2014, 10:12 p.m.
Pitt's Talib Zanna drives past Colorado's Josh Scott during the first half of their NCAA Tournament second-round game Thursday, March 20, 2014, at Amway Center in Orlando, Fla.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Pitt's Talib Zanna drives past Colorado's Josh Scott during the first half of their NCAA Tournament second-round game Thursday, March 20, 2014, at Amway Center in Orlando, Fla.

ORLANDO, Fla. — Pitt players were listening to music and laughing aloud in a locker room so loose there was no indication they were less than 24 hours from playing the nation's No. 1 team.

Following a 29-point victory over Colorado in their NCAA Tournament opener, the ninth-seeded Panthers (26-9) are brimming with confidence as they prepare to play Florida (33-2) in a South Region third-round game at 12:15 p.m. Saturday at Amway Center.

And it didn't appear to faze Pitt that Florida has won 27 consecutive games, went 18-0 in SEC play and practically is playing in its own backyard.

“These are the games you grow up dreaming about and working out for. You want to play in these scenarios,” Pitt fifth-year senior swingman Lamar Patterson said. “Florida is obviously a great team. Everyone wants to beat them. We want to beat them. We're going to give them our best shot.

“It comes down to who wants it more. Florida is a great team, but I feel like we're a great team, also. They have that No. 1 seed, so they have the accolades and we're sort of just reaching what we have potential to be.”

It has the potential to be the biggest win in school history, given the circumstances. Pitt has beaten the nation's No. 1 team before — twice, actually, with victories over Connecticut in 2008-09 — but it never has beaten a team seeded higher than No. 4 (Xavier, 2009) in the NCAA Tournament.

The Panthers have faced a No. 1 seed only once in their NCAA tourney history, losing to N.C. State, 100-72, in 1974. The Wolfpack went on to win the national title.

But Pitt believes the pressure is on Florida. And the Gators, after a lackluster 67-55 victory over Albany, are aware they are playing with bull's-eyes on their backs.

“In this tournament, you have to be aware that every team is fighting for their life, and the goal is just to survive,” Florida senior center Patric Young said. “Seeding doesn't matter when it comes down to between the lines. … We just have to make sure we do whatever it takes to survive, and every team is going to keep that same mindset of just moving on to the next round.”

Pitt fifth-year senior center Talib Zanna is impressed with Florida's chemistry, noting the Gators have four senior starters who have won 117 career games and at least one NCAA tourney game each year.

The Panthers are using Florida's No. 1 ranking and top overall seeding, as well as playing before a pro-Gators crowd, as incentive.

“I don't think we have any pressure right now,” Zanna said. “We really have confidence going into this game. A lot of people are already counting us out. We're just going to use that as motivation, to stay hungry.”

Not only has Pitt won six of its last eight games, but the Panthers nearly beat No. 1 Syracuse on Feb. 12 before Tyler Ennis hit a buzzer-beating 35-footer. They also have a pair of three-point losses to No. 1 seed Virginia.

Now they have another chance to beat No. 1.

“That's kind of in the back of our minds, if at all,” Pitt point guard James Robinson said. “This is a good opportunity for us, a time to show what we were capable of doing all season. We're playing our best basketball right now, so what better time to put it on display?”

Kevin Gorman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @KGorman_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.