Pitt running back calls pain in his sprained left knee a 'minor setback'
Pitt running back James Conner, wearing a brace on his sprained left knee, met Pitt great Dan Marino on Saturday night at the Central Catholic High School charity auction where Conner promised to return from the injury in “just a couple of weeks.”
“It's a minor setback for a major comeback,” he said.
Conner was invited to the event at the Westin William Penn with his friend, Michael Gallagher, a Central Catholic graduate.
Conner said his “heart dropped” when he saw Marino enter the banquet hall.
“It was a blessing to meet Mr. Marino. He gives you those words of wisdom, and you just take everything in,” he said.
“It was a life-changing experience. I'm trying to follow in his footsteps and be a Pitt great.”
Conner called his injury Friday during spring practice “a freak accident.”
“I was just going out of bounds and stepped on it the wrong way,” he said. “Just a couple weeks. It will be good.”
Conner said he knew immediately that keeping the injury private would be difficult.
“When I was holding my knee, I could tell the word was going to get out,” he said.
“That's how social media works these days. It was a huge reaction, but it's good to know people care about our program and care about the team so much.”
Conner, who received an MRI shortly after he was injured, said he was watching ESPN later when he saw a report of a major-league baseball player who suffered a similar injury.
“They said he was going to get an MRI in a couple days,” Conner said. “It kind of shocked me. I got one within hours. I felt pretty special at that point.”
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.