Pitt QBs show they can adapt to change
Three years ago, Trey Anderson was making plans to attend Tyler Junior College in his native Texas.
It made sense.
In 2010, he was an all-state quarterback who led Pearland High School to an undefeated season and a state championship in Texas' largest classification. He set school records for passing yards (4,654), completions (306) and touchdown passes (41).
His size (6-foot, 180 pounds) was an issue, and he had no FBS scholarship offers.
Then Todd Graham changed Anderson's life forever.
Graham needed quarterback depth at Pitt — not unlike this year's team — and he knew about Anderson through his many Texas contacts. Plus, Anderson ran a similar offense at Pearland to Graham's — same plays, formations and high-tempo.
Speaking of Graham, Pitt can thank him for recruiting both quarterbacks — Anderson and Chad Voytik — who will line up Sunday for the penultimate practice of the spring. Voytik, a rising sophomore who led Pitt to victory in the Little Caesars Pizza Bowl in relief of Tom Savage, will be the starter (although he shares snaps equally with Anderson in spring practice).
The depth will be fortified this summer when Adam Bertke of tiny Marion Local (Ohio) High School enrolls. Also, Joe Repischak, who played quarterback at Upper St. Clair, will join the team as a walk-on.
Bertke, in fact, will be Pitt's only scholarship quarterback recruited exclusively by coach Paul Chryst. Tra'von Chapman was dismissed after going through spring drills in 2013 in the wake of pleading guilty to an attempted assault on a former girlfriend. Wade Freebeck, who had verbally committed to Pitt, flipped to Vanderbilt the day before signing day this year.
Chryst's challenge will be dealing with the effects of Voytik's on-the-job training. Other than the bowl game, in which he played only the second half, Voytik has had almost no playing time since the 2011 season at Cleveland (Tenn.) High School when he was ranked by Rivals.com as the nation's No. 4 pro-style quarterback.
Asked what he will take from spring drills, Voytik said: “How much I have to grow. I learned a lot, and as you learn you see how much more you have to learn. I'm experiencing that, and it's exciting because I see that room for improvement, and now it's time to do it.”
Anderson, a rising junior, came to Pitt as a walk-on three weeks before the start of training camp. By the end of August, he had earned a scholarship.
As a freshman, he played in four games, attempting 33 passes, as Graham sought a change of pace from Tino Sunseri. But he's only 2 for 2 in one appearance under Chryst the past two years. He was redshirted last year.
Graham has been gone for 2½ years, replaced by Chryst, who installed a different scheme. Yet Anderson — level-headed and accepting of the situation — said he wouldn't change anything. He said the variety has increased his overall knowledge.
“I joke with my dad all the time,” Anderson said. “I've gone from a junior-college commit in Texas to Pittsburgh. It's been crazy.”
What he especially appreciates is the opportunity to learn from Chryst, one of the nation's most respected quarterback coaches. Anderson wants to be a coach after he graduates.
“It's something I've known since I was a little kid,” he said.
When Pearland won the state championship, coach Tony Heath said Anderson played a “perfect game” and likened him to “a coach on the field.”
“If I could coach with Coach Chryst, that would be awesome,” Anderson said. “Or wherever the job takes me.”
Anderson has no illusions of winning the starting job.
“I don't pay attention to any of that stuff,” Anderson said. “None of that affects me. I compete with myself every day, try to get better every day.”
He also believes he can help Voytik.
“I definitely think I can help him with the mental aspect of it,” Anderson said. “He is definitely stronger and bigger than I am, faster and all that. But we can go through it together.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.