Pitt's Dixon selected to speak on panel discussion at Pentagon
Pitt's Jamie Dixon was one of seven college basketball coaches selected to lead a panel discussion on leadership Wednesday at the Pentagon before about 400 military service members.
Dixon will join Syracuse's Jim Boeheim, Connecticut coaches Geno Auriemma and Kevin Ollie, Michigan State's Tom Izzo, Texas Tech's Tubby Smith and Villanova's Jay Wright as part of the NBA Cares Hoops for Troops “Commitment to Service” program.
It is sponsored by a partnership between the NBA, USA Basketball and the Department of Defense. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and principal military advisor to the president and secretary of defense, will have lunch with the coaches prior to the panel discussion.
Dixon, a four-time national coach of the year selection, has led the Panthers to a 288-96 record in 11 seasons and 10 appearances in the NCAA Tournament. He has served on the NCAA ethics coalition for the past six years and on the National Association of Basketball Coaches board of directors since 2011.
“These preeminent coaches lead their own world-class teams in USA Basketball and the NCAA,” Dempsey said in a statement. “We'll discuss the importance of dynamic leadership to building winning teams and also expose these coaches to what our world-class military team brings to the nation.”
The panel discussion will focus on challenges facing championship-level teams and the military, with topics including motivational and inspirational techniques, mentoring young adults and recruiting and retaining top talent.
The panel discussion will be moderated by ESPN college basketball analyst Jay Bilas and televised live on The Pentagon Channel and webcast at www.pentagonchannel.mil/livestream.aspx at 1:30 p.m.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.