Share This Page

Pitt women's top recruit Gibson of Seton-La Salle headed to junior college

| Wednesday, July 9, 2014, 6:09 p.m.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Seton-La Salle's Naje Gibson scores between Bishop Canevin defenders during their game Thursday, Feb. 6, 2014, at Bishop Canevin.

The Pitt women's basketball team lost a top recruit from Suzie McConnell-Serio's highly regarded 2014 class as Seton-La Salle standout Naje Gibson did not meet NCAA academic eligibility requirements.

Gibson, a 6-foot forward ranked No. 57 overall by Blue Star Basketball, will attend junior college at Florida State College in Jacksonville, Fla., and hopes to eventually play for Pitt.

“Whatever I have to do to get back to Pittsburgh, I'll be happy,” she said Wednesday. “Get my grades right.”

Gibson, who signed a letter of intent in November 2013, will have the opportunity to play NCAA basketball if she graduates from junior college in two years with a minimum GPA of 2.5.

McConnell-Serio's first recruiting class at Pitt was ranked No. 15 in the nation by espnW HoopGurlz and Blue Star Basketball, the highest mark in program history. The class still includes Seton-La Salle guard Yacine Diop, 5-9 guard Aysia Bugg (Bolingbrook, Ill.) and 6-3 center Stasha Carey (Midpark, Ohio).

Karen Price is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach her at kprice@tribweb.com or via Twitter @KarenPrice_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.