Pitt suspends cornerback Howard
Pitt lost another key member of its defense Friday when coach Paul Chryst suspended sophomore cornerback Titus Howard for the season. Howard was listed No. 1 on a depth chart Chryst issued last month.
Chryst did not comment on the reason for Howard's suspension.
Howard, who played on Clairton's four PIAA and WPIAL Class A championship teams, was an important reserve last season. He played in 11 games and started against Old Dominion on Oct. 19 and Bowling Green in the Little Caesars Pizza Bowl on Dec. 26. Overall, he recorded 21 tackles and two pass breakups.
He was expected to compete with former Clairton teammate Trenton Coles for the starting cornerback position vacated when K'Waun Williams graduated.
Freshman cornerbacks Avonte Maddox and Phillipie Motley should receive additional opportunities behind Coles when training camp opens Monday. Freshman safety Patrick Amara played cornerback in the Big 33 game this season.
Under terms of the suspension, Howard will be permitted to remain with the program and can practice, but he will be ineligible for games. Wide receiver Ronald Jones and defensive tackle K.K. Mosley-Smith were suspended under similar terms last season and reinstated this year.
Pitt lost six starters to graduation from last year's defense, including Williams; All-American defensive tackle Aaron Donald, a first-round draft choice with the St. Louis Rams; defensive tackle Ty Ezell; linebacker Shane Gordon and safety Jason Hendricks. Plus, defensive end Bryan Murphy left the program earlier this year, and reserve end Ejuan Price was lost for the season with a pectoral injury.
Jerry DiPaola is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.