Pitt notebook: Pitt offensive line coach ends controversy
• Pitt offensive line coach Jim Hueber was quick to defuse any controversy about his starters. “I haven't moved anybody, really,” he said Wednesday. “I mixed it up a little bit, but I haven't made a move from the first five guys we put out there.” For a brief time, Hueber moved left tackle Adam Bisnowaty to left guard (where sophomore Dorian Johnson usually plays) while inserting redshirt freshman Jaryd-Jones Smith at left tackle. Hueber said the move was made to prepare for a possible emergency. “What we have to do if something would go wrong,” he said. Bisnowaty and Johnson will remain at the positions where they started last week. “There is a dramatic change in Dorian's size (to 310 pounds), which is plenty big enough,” Hueber said. “His awareness is better. I don't know where he goes from here. We have to get him ready to play, and we'll find out.”
• Bisnowaty missed the entire spring with a back ailment, but he has recovered and will keep his job, Hueber said. “Bis is comfortable (at tackle). I hate to take anything away from a guy who truly got injured playing for us. The days of Wally Pipp are over.”
• Senior linebacker Todd Thomas (knee) returned to practice after missing a day and a half. ... Sophomore linebacker Bam Bradley also was back after he was excused to tend to a family matter.
• Redshirt freshman tackle Aaron Reese left drills with an undisclosed injury, sat on a trainer's bench and watched the rest of practice.
• Pitt is developing some depth at tight end among junior J.P. Holtz, sophomores Scott Orndoff and Jaymar Parrish and redshirt freshmen Devon Edwards and Tony Harper. “I like what Scotty can give you,”coach Paul Chryst said. “J.P. has had a really good camp. Jaymar does a lot for us and we keep bringing (Edwards and Harper) along.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.