Monmouth, Quinnipiac leave NEC
The ever-changing landscape of college athletics finally hit the Northeast Conference on Friday.
That's when Monmouth and Quinnipiac announced they were leaving the NEC to join the Metro Atlantic Athletic Conference next year.
That will leave the NEC with 10 teams, including Robert Morris and St. Francis (Pa.) in all sports and Duquesne in football.
The news hasn't changed anything for Robert Morris, according to athletic director Craig Coleman.
“The NEC is still a great conference,” he said from Fargo, N.D., where he attended Friday's FCS semifinal between Georgia Southern and North Dakota State. “The league remains strong. ... (But) this is a very chaotic time for fans of college athletics. It's a shame.”
Monmouth and Quinnipiac will expand MAAC membership to 11. CBSSports.com reported the MAAC eventually could expand to 12 teams and Wagner of the NEC also may be invited.
NEC commissioner Noreen Morris said in a statement that the conference will remain united.
“Next year, we will be 10 members strong, and all 10 members are fully committed to the league,” she said.
St. Francis (Pa.) athletic director Bob Krimmel reaffirmed his school's commitment to the conference.
“I believe we are well-positioned to continue our leadership and to help shape the Northeast Conference into a stronger entity moving forward,” he said.
Paul Schofield is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.