RMU's Toole won't be headed to Siena
Robert Morris men's basketball coach Andy Toole won't be headed to Siena College.
According to the Albany Times Union, Siena hired Loyola (Md.) coach Jimmy Patsos on Tuesday.
Patsos, Toole and Virginia Commonwealth assistant coach Mike Rhoades were reported as finalists for the position to replace Mitch Buonaguro, who was fired last month following an 8-24 season and a ninth-place finish in the Metro Atlantic Athletic Conference.
Toole interviewed for the job on the Siena campus on Thursday.
Patsos has a 143-135 record in nine seasons at Loyola, a rival of Siena in the MAAC. Loyola was 47-21 over the past two years, which included a NCAA trip in 2012.
Toole has been at Robert Morris for the past three seasons, replacing Mike Rice, who took the Rutgers job. Toole, 32, compiled a 68-36 record at RMU. Toole did not return calls seeking comment.
Toole's team won the 2013 Northeast Conference regular-season title and made the NEC Tournament finals twice, losing to Long Island in 2011 and 1012.
His team went 2-1 in the 2012 CollegeInsiders.com Tournament and was 1-1 in the 2013 NIT, which included a 59-57 upset win against defending NCAA champion Kentucky.
The Kentucky win put Toole on the watch list as an up-and-coming coach.
There are many coaching positions currently opened, but Toole hasn't been linked to any. Some of the openings include Hofstra, North Carolina Asheville, Marist and Florida Gulf Coast.
Paul Schofield is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @Schofield_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.