Share This Page

Bad grades could bench RMU QB Jones for 2014 season

| Tuesday, July 15, 2014, 10:25 p.m.

Robert Morris quarterback Paul Jones likely will miss the upcoming football season because of academic ineligibility.

Jones, a senior, is not on the Colonials' roster, and he is not expected to rejoin the team this fall, assistant sports information director Spencer Kowitz said.

The 6-foot-4, 265-pound Sto-Rox alum transferred to Robert Morris in November 2012 after three discouraging seasons at Penn State, where he struggled to live up to his reputation as a four-star recruit. He completed 122 of 261 pass attempts for 1,651 yards and 15 touchdowns for the Colonials. He also threw 11 interceptions.

This is Jones' second go-round with grade trouble. In 2011, Jones was ruled academically ineligible at Penn State.

With Jones absent from the roster, Robert Morris will enter the season lacking a clear starter at quarterback. Akron transfer Marcus Prather, a junior, completed 28 of 59 passes for 347 yards, two touchdowns and three interceptions.

Junior Derik Abbott had the Colonials' only other pass attempt last season — he threw an interception.

Bill West is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at wwest@tribweb.com or via Twitter @BWest_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.