ShareThis Page

WVU beats Bucknell, advances to 2nd round of NCAA Tournament

| Thursday, March 16, 2017, 6:33 p.m.
West Virginia forward Elijah Macon (45) looses control of the ball during the second half of a first-round men's college basketball game in the NCAA Tournament against Bucknell, Thursday, March 16, 2017, in Buffalo, N.Y. (AP Photo/Jeffrey T. Barnes)
West Virginia forward Nathan Adrian (11) grabs a rebound against Bucknell center Nana Foulland (20) during the second half of a first-round men's college basketball game in the NCAA Tournament, Thursday, March 16, 2017, in Buffalo, N.Y. West Virginia won, 86-80. (AP Photo/Bill Wippert)
West Virginia forward Nathan Adrian grabs a rebound against Bucknell center Nana Foulland during the second half of their NCAA Tournament first-round game Thursday, March 16, 2017, in Buffalo, N.Y. West Virginia won 86-80.

BUFFALO, N.Y. — Coach Bob Huggins has spent the past 10 seasons establishing West Virginia's reputation on playing a stifling press defense.

The Mountaineers performance Thursday left Huggins relatively unimpressed despite opening the NCAA Tournament with an 86-80 win over Bucknell on Thursday.

“Well, we weren't very good today,” Huggins said.

It wasn't easy for the 63-year-old coach to stomach watching West Virginia pull ahead by double digits in each half only to allow the Bison to mount a comeback.

Nathan Adrian scored 12 points and had 10 rebounds, while Tarik Phillip scored 16 points, including four free throws in the final minute to secure the victory.

Even Huggins' players acknowledged they can play better.

“We've got to get our heads right and play defense like we know how to,” Adrian said. “We've got to play a little better defense, but we'll fix it.”

At least, West Virginia (27-9) avoided a repeat of last year's first-round meltdown when the third-seeded Mountaineers lost to Stephen F. Austin.

The win sets up a meeting against the region's fifth-seeded Notre Dame Fighting Irish, who hung on for a 60-58 win over Princeton.

Kimbal Mackenzie made 5 of 7 3-point attempts and led the Patriot League-champion Bison with 23 points. Bucknell (26-9) entered the tournament having won six straight and 14 of 16.

Credit Bucknell for not collapsing.

Trailing 27-12 in the first half, the Bison closed West Virginia's lead to 36-33 on Avi Toomer's layup.

Then, after Elijah Macon completed a three-point play to put the Mountaineers up 45-33 in the opening seconds of the second half, Bucknell eventually closed the margin to 63-60 on Mackenzie's contested 3-point basket from the left corner with 8:58 left.

“We've been down a couple of times. We've been down big. And we know we're a mentally tough team that was able to fight back,” Mackenzie said. “We had a lot of weapons, and we didn't panic.”

Bucknell won twice this season when trailing by 11 or more points.

The Mountaineers' superior size proved a difference by outrebounding Bucknell, 42-32, and a 20-6 edge in second-chance points.

What was troubling is how the Mountaineers forced only 15 turnovers, well below the nation-leading 20.4 they were averaging entering the game.

At least West Virginia's offense played to its high-scoring potential.

The Mountaineers scored 85 or more points for the 17th time this season. And with 2,873 points, they're 12 away from breaking the school's single-season record set by the Jerry West-led team in 1958-59.

It didn't help that Bucknell's top player, Nana Foulland, missed a five-minute stretch of the second half after picking up his fourth foul with 9:37 left.

The Patriot League MVP and Defensive Player of the Year finished with 18 points and seven rebounds.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.