ShareThis Page
WVU

Similar paths bond TCU's Kenny Hill, WVU's Will Grier

| Friday, Oct. 6, 2017, 8:09 p.m.

FORT WORTH, Texas — TCU senior quarterback Kenny Hill and West Virginia's Will Grier took similar paths to the Big 12 and face off in the only game between two top 25 teams Saturday.

Before becoming the starter last season for eighth-ranked TCU (4-0, 1-0 Big 12), Hill had to sit out a year after transferring from Texas A&M. Grier also first started in the SEC in five games as a redshirt freshman at Florida. Then, he sat out a year before his debut this season with the 23th-ranked Mountaineers.

Grier and Hill are both good passers who can also run in high-scoring offenses and are backed by the Big 12's top two rushing teams.

“(Hill) was fortunate to be able to be at A&M and play at a high level … but then he had to go through some transition, which always kind of sets people back,” West Virginia coach Dana Holgorsen said. “Not a whole lot different than what we would get out of Will Grier a year from now.”

Now a junior, Grier has thrown for 344 yards a game with 13 touchdowns at West Virginia (3-1, 1-0 Big 12).

“He's a smart quarterback. He knows what he's doing,” TCU safety Niko Small said. “He's in a good offense for himself. He's a mobile quarterback. … Just containing him will be the best thing for us.”

Hill, who threw for 3,208 yards with 17 TDs and 13 interceptions last year, has been efficient this season for the Horned Frogs. He has thrown for 241 yards per game with nine TDs and only three picks.

“They're running the ball a good bit. They're not asking him to sit back there and throw the ball 90 percent of the time. He's got a lot of good people around him, but he is managing it extremely well,” Holgorsen said of Hill. “A very, very, very efficient quarterback at this point.”

Some things to know when the two teams that came into the Big 12 together in 2012 play for the sixth time as conference foes:

Run, run, run

TCU leads the Big 12 with 232.2 yards rushing per game, just ahead of West Virginia's 231 per game. Mountaineers senior Justin Crawford is the league leader at 113 per game, while Frogs sophomore Darius Anderson emerged with top returning rusher Kyle Hicks already missing two games, and is third in the league at 106 yards per game. Crawford and Anderson are tied for the Big 12 lead with six rushing TDs each.

Not as close

The first three games between the Mountaineers and Frogs as Big 12 teams were all decided at the end, twice in overtime. TCU won the 2012 game on the road in double overtime, West Virginia had an overtime win in Fort Worth the next year, and the Frogs won on a game-ending field goal in Morgantown in 2014. The home teams won more decisively the last two years, TCU by 30 points in 2015, and West Virginia by 24 last year.

Streaks/numbers

Since a season-opening loss to Virginia Tech, the Mountaineers scored at least 56 points while winning their last three games. … ESPN College GameDay will broadcast from the TCU campus for the second time (first in 2009 vs. Utah). It is the fifth time the Frogs have been part of GameDay broadcasts the past nine seasons. They have won every time. … WVU's David Sills V has seven receiving TDs to tie for the national lead.

Unranked to top 10

After opening the season unranked, TCU starts October in the AP top 10. The Horned Frogs insist they don't listen to the hype any more than they listen to the critics. Coach Gary Patterson makes sure they think that way. “He lets us know that the same people that will hype you up will tear you down,” safety Niko Small said. “We try to make it not affect us whatsoever.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.