ShareThis Page

WVU defense braces for high-powered Big 12

| Tuesday, Aug. 21, 2012, 12:01 a.m.

MORGANTOWN, W.Va. — The numbers are staggering, intimidating even, when assessing Big 12 offenses, and the defenses around the league designed to stop them.

Three Big 12 offenses ranked among the Top 5 in the nation last season: No. 2 Baylor, No. 3 Oklahoma State and No. 5 Oklahoma. Granted, first-round picks Robert Griffin III and Brandon Weeden have moved on to the NFL, but Texas Tech (No. 13) and newcomer West Virginia (No. 15) make it five Big 12 teams — a full 50 percent of the conference — among the Top 15 offenses.

Three of college football's total offense leaders remain in the Big 12 (Oklahoma's Landry Jones, Texas Tech's Seth Dodge and WVU's Geno Smith). All three quarterbacks enter the season ranked among the Top 10 nationally in passing.

Defensive coordinator Joe DeForest, whose unit faces nine conference opponents, said the Mountaineers have every intention of derailing the Big 12's offensive express.

“We know what we want to do to try to compete in the Big 12 and win a Big 12 championship,” he said. “We're going to be an aggressive defense, we're going to be a zone defense, and we're going to try to create confusion.”

The Big 12 is such a high-powered offensive league that West Virginia coach Dana Holgorsen hired a second defensive coordinator, Keith Patterson, who ran Pitt's defense last season.

While DeForest speaks in superlatives about what's expected from his defense, Patterson chooses a more pragmatic approach to tackling Big 12 offenses.

“Your goals change because of the number of snaps you're playing on defense,” Patterson said. “You're going to give up more yards. So you basically change the way you measure yourself. We look for tackles for loss. We look for three-and-outs. We look for turnovers. We look at red-zone scoring, average yards per play.”

Like most Big 12 defenses, West Virginia will adhere to a bend-but-don't-break philosophy.

Last year, Texas was the only conference member ranked among the Top 15 nationally in total defense at No. 11. TCU was next (No. 32), followed by WVU (No. 33).

“You want to be a great scoring defense,” Patterson said. “You may give up some yards, but the bottom line is scoring more points than their offense. We don't want to give up 35-40 points a game, but you want your defense to complement your offense. We're going to be more aggressive on defense to give the ball back to our offense as much as possible.”

To help with the conference change, West Virginia switched to a 3-4 alignment that goes against the philosophy of most Big 12 defenses.

Asked about the element of surprise, Patterson admits every little bit helps.

“I think it gives you an advantage. It's probably the only 3-4 defense in the Big 12,” he said. “Most defenses in the Big 12 are 4-3. Oklahoma was 3-4 at times. Basically, teams have a week to prepare for a different type front. It can change some blocking schemes and responsibilities.”

Junior linebacker Tyler Anderson observed how effective the defense could be when the offense got its first look at the 3-4.

“I talked to a couple linemen in the spring and they were confused whether I'm down or not,” Anderson said. “It's hard to tell if I'm a defensive end or linebacker.”

Conversely, Will Clarke is listed at defensive end, but the junior from Allderdice now has the flexibility to play linebacker.

“It's a great opportunity because teams won't actually know what we're doing,” he said. “Somebody may put their hand down, they may think we're going to rush inside, but they may drop back in the flat. We may confuse a lot of teams doing that.”

John Harris is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.