WVU football notebook: Offense hitting its mark
LANDOVER, Md. — Senior receiver Tavon Austin couldn't wait for the season to start.
“We're definitely clicking,” said Austin, who has 21 receptions this season. “Coach (Dana Holgorsen) always told us the second year was going to be our best year.”
Holgorsen's track record as an assistant coach at Texas Tech and Houston has been for his offenses to make a big improvement in the second year.
“The first year we kind of struggled a little bit,” Austin said. “Now we're coming together as a team and ready to roll.”
Buie's a catch
Running back Andrew Buie played a big role in the passing game with five catches for 90 yards. He is expected to play an even bigger role in the passing game as the season progresses.
“If you look at the 15 years we've been running this offense, there's always been pass-catching backs,” Holgorsen sad. “To have a pass-catching guy in the backfield is good.”
Odds and ends
WVU established several records Saturday. Not only did Geno Smith break Marc Bulger's career passing record with 8,191 yards, Stedman Bailey finished with a school-record 13 catches. It was Bailey's first double-figure reception game. ... After setting a school mark for most points scored in three games with 169 against South Florida, Clemson and Marshall, the Mountaineers set a three-game scoring record with 181 points with their 42 against James Madison. ... Smith's five TD passes increases his school-record total to 65. ... Smith needs one more pass attempt to equal Bulger's school-record of 1,023. ... Smith's 142 passing yards in the first quarter was also a school record. ... Bailey is tied with David Saunders for the most career 100-yard receiving games (nine).
John Harris is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.