WVU extends AD Luck's contract
MORGANTOWN, W.Va. — West Virginia athletic director Oliver Luck received a new contract that keeps him on the job through 2017 and raises his salary to $550,000 per year. It also sets an annual performance bonus cap of $150,000.
President Jim Clements said Friday that the new contract will go into effect Monday. Luck is in the third year of his original five-year contract, which began in 2010.
“Oliver Luck is a true leader,” Clements said in a release. “He has brought stability, momentum and energy to his position. He is someone we want on our team for many more years to come.”
Luck has overseen major capital improvements, hired new coaches and overseen the most successful fund-raising effort in history, with nearly $23 million raised this past year.
He also has overseen WVU's transition to the Big 12 Conference and developed a master plan for facility upgrades.
“I appreciate the confidence that President Clements has placed in me and the entire athletic department team,” Luck said in a statement. “We will continue to work hard as we transition into the Big 12, and will strive to represent this university and this state with the pride and passion each deserves.
“This is my alma mater, and I am thrilled to serve her.”
Also, West Virginia is working on a new contract for men's basketball coach Bob Huggins.
Luck said a reworked deal should be completed in the next few months.
In 2008, Huggins signed a contract that pays him at least $20 million in guaranteed income through 2019.
The Mountaineers have gone to the NCAA Tournament in each of Huggins' five seasons at his alma mater. He has a 120-56 record. West Virginia went 19-14 last season and lost to Gonzaga in the second round of the NCAA Tournament.
The Charleston Daily Mail first reported Luck was reworking the contract.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.