Share This Page
WVU

Big 12 notebook: Snyder's influence key for Kansas St.

| Monday, Oct. 29, 2012, 8:06 p.m.
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Kansas State head coach Bill Snyder looks on during the second half of an NCAA college football game against Iowa State, Saturday, Oct. 13, 2012, in Ames, Iowa. Kansas State won 27-21. (AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall)

Kansas State is ranked No. 2 in the BCS this week behind Alabama and positioned to play for its first national championship, provided the Wildcats (8-0, 5-0 in Big 12) finish the regular season unbeaten.

Texas coach Mack Brown recalls when coach Bill Snyder guided Kansas State to consecutive 11-win seasons from 1997-2000.

“He's done the best job of anybody in the country this year,” said Brown, who along with Snyder are the deans of Big 12 coaches. “I've been saying since he left Iowa to come to Kansas State, he's been the best coach in America.”

Snyder gave Kansas State national credibility when he suddenly “retired” following the 2005 season. Three years later, however, Snyder resumed control of what had become a struggling program and has returned Kansas State to national relevance.

“He built a program that traditionally couldn't win into a program that has a chance to win all of its games this year and be as good as anybody in the country.” Brown said of Snyder, whom he considers a friend.

“When he was there before, they were really good. He left, they weren't as good. Now he's back, and they're good again.”

Slight disappointment

Oklahoma State won the first conference title in school history last season. But when the Cowboys didn't play for the national championship after being upset by Iowa State, winning the Big 12 title appeared to lose some of its significance.

“I think there's some truth to that,” said Oklahoma State coach Mike Gundy, who's become better known for his 64-32 career record than for his infamous meltdown with a reporter in 2007.

“I talked to our team about how important it would be to be the outright champion. We recognized it, but I don't know if people outside recognize it because there's so much more buildup for a bigger picture in college football.”

Money wasted

Asked about successful college quarterbacks such as Robert Griffin III and Cam Newton running their same offenses in the NFL, Kansas first-year coach Charlie Weis said he's against the idea.

“Those guys on the defensive side of the ball, the more times that they get a free hit on the quarterback that's legal, the more they're going to take,” said Weis, an NFL assistant for 16 years including five years as New England's offensive coordinator, as well as Notre Dame's coach from 2005-09. “With all the money invested in the NFL at quarterback, you can only expose your quarterback so much. You get them knocked out, not only is the guy sitting on injured reserve one of your highest-paid players, you have no one to replace him with.''

John Harris is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at jharris@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.