ShareThis Page

WVU football notebook: Bailey regains top form

| Saturday, Nov. 10, 2012, 10:46 p.m.

STILLWATER, Okla. — West Virginia junior receiver Stedman Bailey returned to form in Saturday's 55-34 loss at Oklahoma State.

Bailey, slowed by an ankle injury he suffered last month at Texas Tech, equaled a school record with 14 receptions. His 225 receiving yards are the second most in his career.

“I felt I was bout 90 percent,” Bailey said. “Once I get one of those (cortisone) shots and it kicks in, then I'm locked in and ready to make plays.”

Bailey's biggest play was a 75-yard catch in the third quarter on a slant pass from Geno Smith that led to Smith's 9-yard touchdown pass to Ryan Nehlen.

Bailey, however, was far from pleased with the result.

“Too many mistakes, and it cost us,” Bailey said. “It makes me frustrated because these are mistakes that we should not be making. We have to live with it for now. Move forward and work on trying to eliminate them, but it's frustrating.”

No excuses

Speaking of mistakes, Tavon Austin made no excuses after misjudging a third quarter bouncing punt that banged off his body and Oklahoma State recovered and converted into a touchdown.

“That's my fault, and I take the blame,” Austin said. “I waved it off when I should have just run at it. It looked like it was going out of bounds, but it bounced back my way, and it hit me.”


Bailey equaled WVU's single-game receiving mark set by Austin against Baylor on Sept. 29. ... Bailey has four 100-yard receiving games this season and 11 in his career, the second-best total in WVU history. ... Bailey is also second in school history with 2,651 receiving yards. ... Bailey has 16 touchdown receptions this season and 32 for his career. ... Austin has 11 touchdown receptions this season and 28 in his career. ... Quarterback Geno Smith ranks second at WVU with 91 career TD passes. He has 31 passes this season.

John Harris is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.