ShareThis Page

Holgorsen reunites with Ok. State

| Saturday, Nov. 10, 2012, 12:01 a.m.
MORGANTOWN, WV - NOVEMBER 03:  Head coach Dana Holgorsen of the West Virginia Mountaineers reacts during the game against the TCU Horned Frogs on November 3, 2012 at Mountaineer Field in Morgantown, West Virginia.  (Photo by Justin K. Aller/Getty Images)
Getty Images
MORGANTOWN, WV - NOVEMBER 03: Head coach Dana Holgorsen of the West Virginia Mountaineers reacts during the game against the TCU Horned Frogs on November 3, 2012 at Mountaineer Field in Morgantown, West Virginia. (Photo by Justin K. Aller/Getty Images)

If West Virginia coach Dana Holgorsen was good for Oklahoma State, then Oklahoma State was certainly good for Holgorsen.

In his one season as offensive coordinator, Holgorsen advanced the development of quarterback Brandon Weeden.

Weeden has moved on to the NFL, and Holgorsen, the coach who helped him get there, returns to face his former team at 3:30 p.m. Saturday in a key Big 12 matchup at Boone Pickens Stadium.

“I felt that in order to get a job like the one I'm fortunate to have now, that it would take being a coordinator at a higher level,” said Holgorsen, who is 15-6 with the Mountaineers. “It was going to take a job like this for me to leave the situation that I was in.”

Holgorsen joined Oklahoma State in 2010 following two seasons at Houston, where he worked magic with quarterback Case Keenum. Holgorsen applied the same principles to Weeden, who was 342 of 511 for 4,277 yards and 34 touchdowns in his first season as a starter.

“We were just a typical spread no-huddle offense,” said Oklahoma State coach Mike Gundy, who hired Holgorsen. “We changed our style of quarterback, so we brought in a scheme that best fit what Brandon Weeden could have success with, which was pocket-style passing.”

Gundy said Holgorsen was the ideal coach to ease the transition.

“Dana was good for us,” Gundy said. “I was just learning the system and how we implement it and teach it and coach it. We learned a lot from his system.”

Holgorsen, in turn, learned from working under Gundy.

“I left Houston to go to Oklahoma State because it was a different level,” Holgorsen said. “(Gundy) does a wonderful job from a structural standpoint and from an organizational standpoint, as far as what your day-to-day operations are like. I took a lot of things from him, and from an offensive standpoint, he took a lot of things from me.”

Oklahoma State offensive coordinator Todd Monken said familiarity won't give either team an advantage.

“It goes both ways,” he said. “What we do and what they do are pretty similar.”

Some of the names have changed, but Oklahoma State's offense has remained virtually the same since Holgorsen's departure.

Despite being forced to play three quarterbacks this season due to injuries, the Cowboys rank No. 2 nationally in total offense and No. 3 in passing offense.

“Just looking at it on tape, there are some specific things they do better than what we do,” Holgorsen said. “If you look at it closely, it's called the same and a lot of the routes are the same. It hasn't changed much at all.”

John Harris is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.