ShareThis Page

Big 12 notebook: Kansas State coach says pressure not a factor in upset

| Monday, Nov. 19, 2012, 5:24 p.m.
Kansas State Wildcats head coach Bill Snyder watches from the sideline during the fourth quarter of the NCAA college football game against Baylor Saturday, Nov. 17, 2012, in Waco Texas. Baylor won 52-24. AP Photo
Kansas State Wildcats head coach Bill Snyder watches from the sideline during the fourth quarter of the NCAA college football game against Baylor Saturday, Nov. 17, 2012, in Waco Texas. Baylor won 52-24. AP Photo

Kansas State's designs on the school's first BCS national championship received a major blow with a shocking 52-24 loss to Baylor.

Asked if his team succumbed to the pressure of playing with the No. 1 ranking, Kansas State coach Bill Snyder offered a diplomatic response.

“The outward appearance was that wasn't a major issue,” Snyder said. “That doesn't mean that it wasn't, but it didn't give that appearance.”

Baylor took a 7-0 lead and never trailed while racking up 580 total yards in the four-touchdown victory.

Kansas State senior quarterback Collin Klein, a leading Heisman Trophy candidate, was intercepted three times after throwing only three interceptions in his first 10 games.

The Wildcats were held to 360 total yards and were uncharacteristically sloppy with seven penalties for 60 yards.

“I thought going in that they were a reasonably well-focused football team taking their preparation seriously,” Snyder said. “I think they do that on a regular basis. If there was an amount of pressure that they felt, I wasn't overly aware of it.”

Weis' strategy mixed bag

Kansas coach Charlie Weis reached out to his student body prior to Saturday's Senior Day game against Iowa State.

Weis went on his Twitter account and offered to buy tickets for any student who wanted to attend the game.

Results were mixed.

School officials estimate that a small amount of students took up Weis on his offer. Unfortunately, the Jayhawks were humiliated, 51-23, for their 20th consecutive Big 12 loss.

“It was a good experience for the people who went because there were a lot more more people at the game who (wouldn't) have been at the game if I didn't (buy tickets),” Weis said. “You're a student going to college. You don't have a ticket for the game. It's a beautiful night. You want to go to the game but you really don't have the money for it. Well, there were a lot of seats left. Somebody stepped up to the plate and took care of it.”

Kansas led, 14-10, early in the second quarter before the bottom fell out. The Jayhawks, who conclude the regular season at West Virginia on Dec. 1, have not won a Big 12 game since facing Colorado as a conference opponent in 2010.

“It was nice and loud early. The game was competitive into the second quarter,” Weis said. “The game started to get away from us, but it didn't get away from us because of the fan base.”

Big win boosts Baylor

Last year, Baylor reaped the benefits from Robert Griffin III being the first Heisman Trophy winner in school history. This year, Baylor also figures to benefit nationally following its big win over Kansas State.

“It helps, especially in recruiting,” Baylor coach Art Briles said. “It helps our players feel good about the work and effort they put in. We got a little bit of buzz last year with Robert winning the Heisman. It's good for the university, good for our program.”

John Harris is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.