ShareThis Page

West Virginia's defense finally has its moment

| Tuesday, Nov. 27, 2012, 10:28 p.m.
West Virginia safety Darwin Cook, left, upends Iowa State running back Jeff Woody, top, forcing a fumble during the second half of an NCAA college football game on Friday, Nov. 23, 2012, in Ames, Iowa. West Virginia recovered the ball and won the game 31-24. (AP Photo/Matthew Putney)

A sense of relief filled West Virginia defensive coordinator Joe DeForest when Tavon Austin's 75-yard touchdown reception gave the Mountaineers a 31-24 lead at Iowa State.

But only for an instant.

More than six minutes remained in a game that WVU would eventually win by the same margin to snap a five-game losing streak.

“I thought we scored too quick,” said DeForest, before quickly adding, “Just joking.”

You couldn't blame DeForest for trying to maintain a happy face while hoping his defense wouldn't blow another late lead. After all, it's been that kind of season for the Mountaineers.

DeForest is well aware of his defense's history.

WVU (6-5, 3-5 Big 12) met with a different result in one-point losses to Oklahoma and TCU, but the Mountaineers — give or take a few tense moments — didn't repeat their previous mistakes against Iowa State.

Aided by two personal fouls against WVU — both times after the Mountaineers held on downs — Iowa State drove from its 35 to first-and-goal at the 7.

Instead of wilting, the Mountaineers defense finally took charge.

Running back Jeff Woody carried for 2 yards but Darwin Cook forced a fumble, which freshman Karl Joseph recovered in the end zone for a touchback, allowing DeForest to finally breathe easy.

“Our defense played really, really well. They knew they had to make a stop,” DeForest said. “That's part of playing defense, when you've got to make a stop to win the game.”

WVU's goal-line stand did wonders for the defense's confidence.

“That was going through everybody's head when we kept getting penalties and they drove down the field,” Joseph said. “Even with five (straight) losses, we never gave up. We kept fighting.”

Added Cook: “We've had a lot of things go wrong this year. But when the play is over, you've got to get ready for the next play.”

DeForest was pleased with Cook's and Joseph's ability to recover after the defense was burned for two touchdown passes.

In previous losses, WVU's defense couldn't recover from those mistakes.

Entering Saturday's regular-season finale against Kansas (1-10, 0-8), WVU's defense finally has a performance to build on.

“(Iowa State) did not do one thing differently,” DeForest said. “We practiced everything that they had done and we executed well 75 percent of the time. Then, just like in the past, we gave up some plays that we shouldn't give up based on pure technique.

“We've got to work on that. We're going to get better.”

John Harris is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.