ShareThis Page

Six WVU players selected for Big 12 honors

| Wednesday, Dec. 5, 2012, 1:50 p.m.

Here's how good the Big 12 is this season: West Virginia quarterback Geno Smith, who passed for more than 4,000 yards for the second consecutive season, didn't receive first-team, all-conference honors.

Smith, second-team behind Kansas State quarterback Collin Klein, was among six Mountaineers named to the All-Big 12 team Wednesday.

Other Mountaineers honored include receivers Tavon Austin and Stedman Bailey (second team), center Joe Madsen (second team), safety Karl Joseph (honorable mention) and receiver Ryan Nehlen (honorable mention, scholar-athlete).

The Mountaineers, who face Syracuse in the New Era Pinstripe Bowl on Dec. 29 at Yankee Stadium, went 7-5, 4-5 in their first season in the Big 12.

Smith, the Big 12 preseason offensive player of the year, passed for 4,004 yards and 40 touchdowns with six interceptions. Klein threw for 2,490 yards, 15 touchdowns and seven interceptions and rushed for 890 yards and 22 scores. One of three Heisman Trophy finalists, he also was named Big 12 offensive player of the year.

Austin (110) and Bailey (106) had more than 100 receptions while averaging more than 100 yards per game — the first time that has occurred in school history.

Bailey, a junior, leads the FBS with 23 TD catches.

Austin, who has scored via rushing, receiving, punt return and kickoff return, was named Big 12 co-special teams player of the year. He set a school record with 344 yards rushing against Oklahoma.

Madsen, a senior, started all 50 career games in which he has played.

Joseph, a freshman, led WVU with 95 tackles (73 unassisted). He also had 9 12 tackles for loss, six pass breakups, two interceptions and one sack.

John Harris is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.