ShareThis Page

WVU's Holgorsen: 'Time for me to go to work'

Kevin Gorman
| Tuesday, July 23, 2013, 6:27 p.m.
West Virginia coach Dana Holgorsen greets wide receiver Tavon Austin during their 59-10 victory over Kansas on Dec. 1, 2012, at Mountaineer Field at Milan Puskar Stadium in Morgantown, W.Va.
West Virginia coach Dana Holgorsen greets wide receiver Tavon Austin during their 59-10 victory over Kansas on Dec. 1, 2012, at Mountaineer Field at Milan Puskar Stadium in Morgantown, W.Va.

DALLAS ­— West Virginia enters its second season in the Big 12 with what Dana Holgorsen calls the “exact opposite” expectations from last year.

Where the Mountaineers were a top-10 team thanks to a star-studded cast of skill players and despite an inexperienced defense, they now are picked to finish eighth in the 10-team conference.

West Virginia must replace nine offensive starters, including quarterback Geno Smith and receivers Tavon Austin and Stedman Bailey, from a team that finished a disappointing 7-6 last year.

Surprisingly, Holgorsen finds it “refreshing.”

“We don't have anybody coming back, but it's pretty much the exact reason why I got hired two-and-a-half years ago,” Holgorsen said Tuesday at Big 12 media days. “I'd rather it be put on me to make sure our offense is going in the right direction than have to rely on the side of the ball that I'm not involved with as much.

“Defensively, we've got more experience coming back and I like where we're headed schematically and coaches-wise, which will allow me to be able to focus exclusively on offense. Not to say I'm not going to understand what we're doing defensively or special teams-wise, but why was I hired? I was hired because of what we did offensively. It's time for me to go to work.”

Florida State transfer Clint Trickett, junior Paul Millard and redshirt freshman Ford Childress will compete to replace Smith as the starting quarterback. Holgorsen believes one of the three will separate himself quickly in training camp and hopes to name a starter as soon as possible.

Picking a starting running back might be tougher, simply because of the depth at the position. Andrew Buie led the team in rushing with 851 yards, including 207 against Texas, while Dustin Garrison averaged 4.5 yards per carry in 10 games. Houston transfer Charles Sims ran for 2,370 yards in three seasons and was named the Big 12's preseason Newcomer of the Year. Dreamius Smith was one of the nation's most coveted junior-college backs.

“We need some playmakers on offense after losing, I think, 90 percent of our production last year or whatever that crazy number is,” Holgorsen said. “I do feel good about where we're at, running back-wise.”

Holgorsen said he hasn't lost sleep over his star trio heading to the NFL.

“I'll say this: I'm glad some of them are gone,” said Oklahoma coach Bob Stoops, whose Sooners host West Virginia on Sept. 7. “I'm sure Dana's got new guys coming in, but they were some special guys, especially running the football. Dana does a great job. ... I'm sure he'll have his new guys schooled up to do it well again.”

That's what could make this Mountaineers team dangerous: the unknown.

“A year ago, we knew how good those guys were,” said Iowa State coach Paul Rhoads, whose Cyclones visit WVU on Nov. 30. “They were very scary. That was nothing but reaffirmed when we lined up and played them.

“That team a year ago, you knew you were going to have your hands full. This team might end up being better, but time will tell on that.”

Kevin Gorman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @KGorman_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.