Former Pitt RB Shell picks WVU as transfer destination
College Football Videos
Rushel Shell has found a new home.
Shell, the leading rusher in Pennsylvania high school history, said Friday that he plans to transfer to West Virginia.
WVU officials had no comment on Shell's decision, but Mike Montoro, director of football communications, said, “Yes, we are actively recruiting him.”
Shell, who has three years of eligibility remaining, would have been the No. 1 running back at Pitt this season before he decided to transfer after six spring practices. Initially, he said he would attend UCLA, but he changed his mind to stay closer to his family, including twin 17-month-old daughters Amiyah and Arionna.
He reached out to Pitt officials this summer for a possible return, but coach Paul Chryst wouldn't allow it. Shell also considered Kentucky, where former Pitt players Chris and Demitrious Davis have transferred, and Ohio State. West Virginia showed the most interest, however.
Shell is the second running back who said he wants to transfer to the Mountaineers. Charles Sims, who has one year of eligibility remaining, joined the team this year from the University of Houston.
As a transfer student, Shell must sit out the 2013 season, but he will join the team next year when running back depth could become an issue for West Virginia.
Andrew Buie and Dustin Garrison, the team's leading rushers from 2012, will be seniors when Shell becomes eligible.
Shell, who ran for 9,078 yards and a WPIAL-record 110 touchdowns in four seasons at Hopewell, was the backup to Ray Graham last season at Pitt, rushing for 641 yards and four touchdowns.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.