WVU linebacker up to challenge against Sooners
College Football Videos
MORGANTOWN — If West Virginia is to beat Oklahoma on Saturday night in Norman, Nick Kwiatkoski is going to have to have the game of his life.
And the former Bethel Park star may just be up for it.
As the Sam linebacker, the run-happy Sooners will test him, just as William & Mary did in the opener. That was a rather bad decision on William & Mary's part, as he made the second tackle of the season for WVU and finished the game as the Mountaineers' leading tackler.
But do not confuse William & Mary with Oklahoma.
The Sooners have a stable of big time running backs and quarterback in Trevor Knight, who has yet to prove himself as a passer but was their leading rusher with 103 yards in their 34-0 opening victory over Louisiana-Monroe.
Kwiatkoski knows what he and WVU is up against.
“Three different running backs, all have different styles of running. Our biggest focus right now is knowing who is in the game and what their strengths are,” he said.
And the quarterback is definitely one of those strengths.
“From the film watched so far, the quarterback can definitely got out of the pocket. He'll definitely cause a problem for us.
“He's not huge, but he's fast and shifty at times. You have to keep an eye on him. You can't break coverage, but you know he can always tuck it and run.”
Make no mistake, Kwiatkoski is prepared for this, although there remain those from back home who still have trouble accepting he's playing 90 miles down the road from Pitt.
“I visited WVU my junior year of high school and immediately fell in love with the coaching staff, the facilities. I'm from Pittsburgh, so it wasn't far away,” he said.
He didn't commit right away, but when he did, you would have thought he'd joined the Baltimore Ravens, considering the reaction.
“When I first committed here, I got quite a bit, but it's calmed down over the years,” he said, pointing out that the Backyard Brawl rivalry has died and the two schools have gone in different directions.
Kwiatkoski said he felt some pressure about coming to WVU because of the reaction it might cause.
“It did (enter my mind). Before I committed, I was always having thoughts like maybe I should wait, maybe I should go to Pitt, but I don't have second thoughts.
“Once I got it over with, I was happy with my decision and I've loved every minute of it.”
Kwiatkoski came to WVU after missing a couple of months of his senior high school season with a bad back, returning to help Bethel Park into the playoffs. He was a wide receiver and safety then, but WVU saw him as a linebacker.
“I came in kind of big for a safety, so I had an idea I was going to move to an outside linebacker,” he said.
Before the 2011 season, Bill Stewart was fired as WVU coach and Dana Holgorsen took over. A year later the defense changed, making Kwiatkoski fit even more into a linebacker's role.
After a redshirt year, he played 12 games in 2012, starting one. This season Kwiatkoski has moved smoothly into the starting job under new defensive coordinator Keith Patterson.
Holgorsen had nothing but praise for his opening game performance.
“He brings toughness. He's a smart player,” the coach said. “You know Darwin Cook was our MVP, but he was a close, close second. He's a smart guy, he's mature and he is physically impressive. He runs pretty good. He gives pop at the point of attack.”
More than pop, he brings an awareness to the position.
“He brings an understanding of the game, which for a linebacker is very important because you have to be able to sort things out mentally and you have to be able to react to things, trust what you see and get after it. We were very happy with his performance,” Holgorsen said.
Bob Hertzel is a freelance writer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.