Share This Page
WVU

Holgorsen names redshirt freshman Childress starting QB

| Thursday, Sept. 12, 2013, 11:24 p.m.

MORGANTOWN — In keeping with the theme of trying to get the offense untracked, West Virginia football coach Dana Holgorsen announced on his radio show that redshirt freshman Ford Childress will make his first collegiate start at quarterback in Saturday's noon game against Georgia State.

“We feel like he's ready,” Holgorsen said on the show. “His fire is lit. He's sat there on the sidelines. When given the opportunity, he's grabbed it and said, ‘Let's go.' ”

Junior Paul Millard started the season's first two games, and WVU went 1-1 and scored only four touchdowns.

Holgorsen admitted that wasn't good enough during his weekly meeting with the media as he opened the competition at quarterback between Millard, Florida State transfer Clint Trickett and Childress.

“I feel like crap, honestly,” Holgorsen said. “It goes back to the offense where we have the potential to be better than we were last year. Does that mean we are better than last year, or are going to be better than last year? No. It just means we have the potential to be.”

“We've scored four touchdowns on the year,” offensive coordinator Shannon Dawson added. “That's not acceptable.”

Childress has not appeared in a collegiate game and, until this week, hadn't taken a meaningful snap in practice as the reps were shared between Millard and Trickett.

Holgorsen also has shaken up the receiving corps and has junior college transfers Kevin White, Ronald Carswell and Mario Alford taking first-team snaps.

Related Content
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.