Share This Page
WVU

WVU hoping to get quarterbacks healthy during off-week

| Wednesday, Oct. 9, 2013, 12:56 a.m.

MORGANTOWN, W.Va. — West Virginia coach Dana Holgorsen's Monday night was spent the same way millions of other Americans spent theirs, with his attention turned to Monday Night Football as the Jets came from behind to defeat the Falcons.

He, though, was viewing it through a different lens than the rest of the nation, watching Jets rookie quarterback Geno Smith engineer a come-from-behind victory, just as he had done for him on a number of occasions when Smith was breaking every passing record at WVU.

Considering the problems Holgorsen has had this season at quarterback, starting three different signal callers in six games on the way to a 3-3 record as his team goes into a bye week at the mid-point in the season, and considering they were coming off an embarrassing 73-42 loss at Baylor, one could only imagine the thoughts that went through Holgorsen's mind as he watched Smith operate.

Baylor's 73 points were the second most points WVU had ever given up, the record having been set in 1904 by Michigan in a 130-0 romp. Considering that Baylor had led 42-7 halfway through the second quarter and came to halftime with a 56-14 advantage and 604 total yards, it is not outrageous to assume that had Bears coach Art Briles not pulled his starters one series into the second half they might have scored 100 points and gained 1,000 yards in the game.

This beating comes a year after WVU, with Smith at quarterback and targeting current NFL receivers Tavon Austin and Stedman Bailey, beat Baylor, 70-63, with 807 total yards and Smith throwing eight TD passes.

“It would be nice to have him,” Holgorsen admitted, when asked his emotions while watching Smith perform, especially in lieu of the ordeals WVU has gone through with Clint Trickett, Ford Childress and Paul Millard struggling through a difficult learning period and injuries.

“It would be nice to have any of the six last ones I've had,” he added, referring to Smith, Brandon Weeden, Case Keenum, Graham Harrell, Cody Hodges and Chris Hatcher. “Who knows which of the guys on our team right now can keep improving to the point that they are the next Geno Smith?

“They just have to keep playing. You look at Clint and Ford — they've only played two games in a Mountaineer uniform. They have to continue to get better. It's unfortunate that they're both dealing with injuries, but they have to continue to improve. I have all the confidence in the world that they will continue to improve.”

In truth, Saturday night it was difficult to watch Trickett struggle with a sore shoulder that had his arm dangling at his side when not in use and that even had him talking on the phone between series using his left hand rather than his right.

With a game plan that called for a number of deep post patterns against Baylor, it was no wonder an injured Trickett could complete only 9 of 28 attempts, one more completion against the Bears than Smith had TD passes last year.

As the Mountaineers enter an off-week before resuming Big 12 play at home against unbeaten Texas Tech at noon Oct. 19, Holgorsen plans to have Trickett rest his shoulder and Childress rest his torn pectoral muscle.

He said he was uncertain which one would start against Texas Tech, noting that Childress had “done nothing to lose his job” other than tear the muscle and that Trickett owned the upset victory over No. 11 Oklahoma State and played well enough in that game to be the starter if healthy.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.