WVU football position battles to watch
West Virginia opened football camp Thursday.
The Tribune-Review breaks down position battles to watch.
1. Running back: With witness intimidation charges dropped against Wendell Smallwood, the Mountaineers are back to a full house of five worthy ballcarriers, some of whom will double as slot receivers. Pitt transfer Rushel Shell might be the most talented runner, but how he fits into the Air Raid offense remains to be seen.
2. Free safety: Sophomore Jeremy Tyler, who had 10 unassisted tackles (2 1⁄2 for loss) and a forced fumble against Iowa State in his lone 2013 start, emerged from spring practice No. 1 on the depth chart. But Dravon Henry, a freshman from Aliquippa, might take away the job.
3. Wide receiver: The Mountaineers accounted for 16 receiving TDs in 2013. The prior season, future St. Louis Rams Tavon Austin and Stedman Bailey rolled up 37. OK, so Geno Smith was doing the throwing in 2012 and WVU ran a QB carousel in 2013. But more will be asked from returnees Kevin White, Daikiel Shorts, Mario Alford and Jordan Thompson, and newcomers like Ricky Rogers, a freshman from Gateway, will get long looks.
Newcomer to watch: Henry, who rushed for more than 5,000 yards at Aliquippa but is better suited to defense, will spend a lot of time on the field.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.