Share This Page

Kovacevic: It's OK to be like Tamika, too

| Friday, July 6, 2012, 12:10 a.m.
The Indiana Fever's Tamika Catchings drives against the Tulsa Shock's Chante Black during a WNBA basketball game Saturday, June 23, 2012, in Tulsa, Okla. (AP Photo/Tulsa World, Matt Barnard)

Anyone immersed in the recent NBA Finals had to come away with one overwhelming impression: LeBron James, a champion at long last, is The Man.

What LeBron still isn't, apparently, is The Woman.

It takes some doing for any pro basketball story to register on my radar, never mind one that whizzes across the laptop screen via the fickle form of Twitter. But there it was a few days ago, this beauty from the official @WNBA account:

“NBA Stats has created a new formula that allows us to accurately compare individual players between NBA/WNBA!”

Oh, boy/girl!

I clicked anyway.

“NBA Stats has developed a new rating called the Player Impact Estimate, or PIE, that calculates a player's impact on each game,” the article on WNBA.com explained. “It eliminates statistical biases created by league, style of play or even era.”

Or gender?

“And now, thanks to PIE, we can make a definitive link between Tamika Catchings and LeBron James.”

Forehead, meet desk.

Why, why, why is it so common in women's sports to compare to the men?

I have to tell you, when I had the thrill of a lifetime covering the 100 meters at the Athens Olympics right at track level, the experience of watching the world's eight fastest women sprinting toward me wouldn't have been improved in the slightest by, say, how they'd run against Usain Bolt.

Unfortunately, this practice of false — and forced — equivalency happens everywhere.

When the great Tennessee basketball coach Pat Summitt gracefully stepped down to focus on her fight with Alzheimer's, she did so with eight NCAA titles, more than anyone in her profession. And yet it was stated again and again that those titles were second only to UCLA legend John Wooden for “men or women.” As if her own case wasn't strong enough.

When Pitt guard Shavonte Zellous in 2009 became the first player in school history to score 600-plus points in three separate seasons, it often was accompanied by “men or women.”

Given how Zellous raised Agnus Berenato's program to new heights, that clause actually diminished her work. With it, she was just another player among Jamie Dixon's men.

Women's sports are different. They are their own entity.

With few exceptions, there are different rules, different balls, different tactics, and, yes, that's because the different genders make for different skill sets. Let's not pretend otherwise. You won't see Cammi Granato firing 100-mph slap shots or Jennie Finch challenging Justin Verlander's fastball.

That's not a deficiency. That's DNA.

At the same time, women's sports have traits that can make their brand better. You won't often see dunks in women's basketball, but you'll see an actual bounce pass. You won't see 120-mph aces in women's tennis, but you'll see edge-of-your-seat serve-and-volley action. It's flat-out more fun to watch.

Sloane Martin, a radio reporter in Western New York and women's sports advocate, sounds just as put off by PIE as I am.

“Can't Maya Moore be great by virtue of being Maya Moore?” Martin said of the WNBA star. “Or does she have to have Kobe Bryant's competitiveness and Dwyane Wade's scoring? Even if it's flattery, there's always a message that these players aren't good enough just being themselves.”

Suzie McConnell-Serio, the Duquesne women's basketball coach and as accomplished a female athlete as our region has produced, sees a positive to the practice.

“I think they're just letting people know what the equivalent is on the men's side,” she said of the WNBA, her onetime employer as player and coach. “I can paint a picture of how they stack up, what makes a women's player worth watching in her own right.”

OK, I'll concede that. And not just because Suzie used to kick tail in local men's leagues.

But compare that short-term gain to the environments of, say, tennis and the Olympics. No one compares Venus Williams to Novak Djokovic. And no one in London will compare Coraopolis diver Cassidy Krug to Greg Louganis. The women in those worlds are simply the best at what they do.

That should be enough.

But if it isn't, hey, that WNBA article concluded that Catchings' PIE rating over the past decade was 16.63 to LeBron's 16.32.

So she's officially good.

Dejan Kovacevic is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at dkovacevic@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.