Prospect watch: OLSH's Isiah Neely
By Kevin Gorman
Published: Saturday, Sept. 22, 2012, 11:38 p.m.
5-foot-8, 175 pounds, RB, Our Lady of the Sacred Heart
Isiah Neely was looking forward to going to see Pitt play Gardner-Webb on Saturday, given his family connections to both.
Neely grew up a Panthers fan while rooting for his cousin, former Pitt All-America tight end Dorin Dickerson. Another cousin, Ron Dickerson Jr., is Gardner-Webb's coach.
Neely had to cancel those plans when he suffered a sprained ankle Friday night at Sto-Rox, one that sidelined him for the second half and necessitated an X-ray. Still, his week wasn't all bad. Neely received his first scholarship offer Thursday from Robert Morris.
“That felt good,” he said. “Hopefully, more will come.”
One of the most productive rushers in Western Pennsylvania, Neely surpassed the 3,000-yard mark after rushing for 708 yards as a sophomore and 1,557 yards and 22 touchdowns as a junior.
“He's quick and can dart outside,” Metro Index scouting director Joe Butler said. “He's a talented guy, but the level of competition scares people.”
Despite playing in WPIAL Class A, Neely has attracted interest from FBSprograms like Pitt, Akron, Kent State and Wisconsin to FCS schools Duquesne, RMU and Villanova.
“I was hoping a big senior season might open eyes,” Neely said.
Neely got off to a good start, with a 310-yard, five-TD game against Western Beaver two weeks ago. The injury against Sto-Rox proved a setback, but Neely remains optimistic.
“I would prefer a scholarship if that school fits me, but I have to do what I have to do,” Neely said. “Everyone has been recruiting me as a running back. I think I'm a finesse and a power back. I can lower my shoulder and run through people or make moves and get upfield. I play cornerback and return punts and kicks and play in the slot, too, so I'm pretty versatile.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.