ShareThis Page
Kevin Gorman

Kevin Gorman's Take 5: Five thoughts on Super Bowl LII

Kevin Gorman
| Monday, Feb. 5, 2018, 2:50 a.m.
Nick Foles of the Philadelphia Eagles celebrates his 34-yard touchdown pass to Alshon Jeffery (not pictured) during the first quarter against the New England Patriots in Super Bowl LII at U.S. Bank Stadium on February 4, 2018 in Minneapolis, Minnesota.  (Photo by Streeter Lecka/Getty Images)
Getty Images
Nick Foles of the Philadelphia Eagles celebrates his 34-yard touchdown pass to Alshon Jeffery (not pictured) during the first quarter against the New England Patriots in Super Bowl LII at U.S. Bank Stadium on February 4, 2018 in Minneapolis, Minnesota. (Photo by Streeter Lecka/Getty Images)

1. The NFL (finally) got it right: How appropriate that the go-ahead score to decide Super Bowl LII came on a play that has been at the center of controversy, one that previously worked in the New England Patriots' favor but this time came back to bite them.

When Philadelphia Eagles tight end Zach Ertz dived into the end zone, only to see the ground force the ball into the air before it landed back in his hands, the NFL had to confront its complete-the-catch rule. It was reminiscent of the play cost the Steelers a last-minute touchdown against the Patriots on Dec. 17 at Heinz Field, when a review ruled that Jesse James' touchdown catch did not survive the ground.

As NBC's Al Michaels said, "You know, I'm sure in Pittsburgh they're going, 'Are you kidding me? If they called Jesse James' back, what are they going to do with this one?'"

When Cris Collinsworth responded, "I cannot wait for them to change this rule," Michaels finished the sentence by saying, "Hopefully, by the end of this game. You knew the catch, no-catch thing was going to rear its ugly head before the end of this game."

This time, Ertz was ruled to have completed the catch, making a football play and turning himself into a runner who scored once the ball crossed the plane of the goal line.

This time, the officials got it right.

2. Steratore stumbles at start, finishes strong: How appropriate that the referee to relay that, upon review, the call on the field stood was none other than Washington's Gene Steratore .

Steratore got off to a rocky start in his first Super Bowl, botching the introduction of the honorary captain at the coin toss, Cpl. Hershel "Woody" Williams, a Medal of Honor recipient for his heroics at Battle of Iwo Jima in World War II. Steratore called him Willie Williams and Cpl. Wilson.

Blame that on nerves.

Steratore and his crew were solid in the game, calling only seven penalties for 40 yards. Rob Gronkowski drew the Patriots' first flag of the postseason, for a false start in the first half.

But Steratore was the referee for games in which the catch rule was controversial, those involving Calvin Johnson and Dez Bryant, so he must be relieved to have been involved in one that wasn't overturned.

3. Backups best Belichick, Brady: How appropriate that Tom Brady broke his own Super Bowl record with 505 passing yards, three touchdowns and no interceptions, but the Super Bowl LII MVP honors went to Eagles quarterback Nick Foles instead.

Foles, the backup until Carson Wentz suffered a season-ending knee injury, was nothing short of brilliant in completing 28 of 43 passes for 373 yards and three touchdowns, with one interceptionthe.

Collinsworth made a great observation: "Doug Pederson, a career backup quarterback, had his backup quarterback in the game, and he called those plays with such guts, like he was calling them for himself."

But it was the catch that Foles made an Brady didn't that made a difference in the game. Where Brady dropped a throw from Danny Amendola that went off his fingertips, Foles caught a fourth-and-goal pass from tight end Trey Burton, a former Florida quarterback, for a touchdown late in the second quarter.

What was amazing is that Foles executed the same play at Westlake High School in Travis County, Texas.

4. Defense (kind of) wins championships: How appropriate that in a game in which the teams set not only a Super Bowl record but modern-day NFL record with 1,151 yards (613 for the Patriots, 537 for the Eagles), the play that might have decided the game was a strip sack.

Sure, Ertz gave the Eagles the lead. But Brady is magical in the fourth quarter, owning 11 career postseason comback victories, including five in Super Bowls. So, no lead was safe with 2:21 remaining.

When the game was on the line, the Eagles' defense came up big. Brandon Graham got a strip sack of Brady that was recovered by rookie Derek Barnett. That set up rookie Jake Elliott's 46-yard field goal for a 41-33 lead with 1:05 remaining.

The Patriots still had a chance, but this was going to require more than magic.

They needed a miracle, and their Hail Mary fell incomplete in the end zone.

5. Pittsburgh roots for Philly: How appropriate that in a pick-your-poison Super Bowl, Pittsburghers could revel in a Philadelphia team winning a world championship. The rivalry between Penguins and Flyers fans is intense, and Pirates-Phillies once was spirited and even Pitt fans despised Villanova, simply for Scottie Reynolds.

But the Eagles hadn't registered much on the Steelers' radar.

Philadelphians finally ended their five-decade drought for a Super Bowl championship. By preventing the Patriots from tying the Steelers with six Lombardi trophies, many Pittsburghers were pulling for them.

Even if, aside from that video, Philly's celebration was mostly inappropriate.

Kevin Gorman is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at kgorman@tribweb.com or via Twitter @KGorman_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me