CCAC brings home eighth state crown
Submitted The CCAC golf team rounded up the eighth state tile in school history. The team is from left, Dan Blahnik, head coach Chuck Bell, Ben Kennedy, Eric Poplowski, who also won the individuual state championship, and Paul Ajak.
For the eighth time in school history, the CCAC men's golf team has earned the distinction of being called state champions. The course was cold and nasty according to CCAC coach Chuck Bell, but his boys pulled it off.
Leading the way was Eric Poplowski of Ambridge, who won the individual state title with scores of 72 and 72.
“It's been two years now,” Poplowski said. “We set these goals, and kept our eye on the prize.
“I just kept my head in (the game) and hit straight shots off the tee.”
Poplowski said he should have sunk more putts, but he didn't let a tough start get him down.
While Poplowski took first, teammates Paul Ajak of Aspinwall and Ben Kennedy of Sewickley tallied scores of 80, 79 and 80, 81 to earn third and fourth place.
“We finally got it done as a team,” Ajak said. “Me and Eric wanted to win it as a team, and we are excited because it is our last year here, so this win was a weight off our shoulders.”
Ajak said he didn't have his best round but was happy with the end result.
Kennedy credited Bell with pushing the team and the team in turn pushing each other.
“Chuck is never down on us,” Kennedy said. “We didn't let the weather get to us, either. We just tried to dress in layers and stay warm.”
Bell mentioned Dan Dalhnik as another player who played a big role in this victory.
“It never gets old,” Bell said. “We always have fun and try to win because this is our goal. Everyone has to be good, but we expect that.”
Jerry Clark is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-779-6979 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.