Local weightlifter believes in power of the mind
Competitive weightlifters always go face-to-face with the physical challenge of executing their lift successfully. But if a lifter is not mentally ready, the lift can become doubly challenging.
For Allegheny Township resident Robert Gregory, the mental aspect comes easier than most.
Gregory, 41, is a psychologist at the Westmoreland Intermediate Unit Seven during the day and does outpatient-therapy at a family counseling center in Armstrong County at night. He competes in the 181-pound Raw Division in the World Natural Powerlifting Federation. In November, he took first place in the deadlift competition at the WNPF World Tournament of Champions, lifting 480 pounds while weighing only 172 at the time. Competitors in the Raw Division have no assistance of equipment.
Deadlifting is primarily a leg exercise where the lifter starts in a squatted position with the bar in front of his body at the shins. The lifter then begins to squat up carefully using his legs to lift the weight back up into a standing position.
But here's where Gregory has somewhat of a mental edge: Gregory uses a technique called “guided imagery” before he executes his lifts.
“It's an attempt to visualize your lift prior to doing it,” Gregory said. “I try to visualize it first in my mind the completion of the lift.”
He has been competing for 15 years, and his personal best in deadlifting is 520 pounds, which occurred in May 2011. The lift is a Pennsylvania State record for the 181-pound Lifetime Raw Division.
D.J. Vasil is a freelance writer.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.