Hampton's Hart wins state wrestling gold
Jake Hart put together an unforgetable season as a senior.
Photo by Louis Raggiunti | Pine Creek Journal
In what will be a season for the ages for the Hampton wrestling program, Jake Hart may have capped off the best season ever.
Winning an Allegheny County Championship, capturing a WPIAL Championship and setting a new standard as the career wins leader for the Talbots (144) were all nice accomplishments, but there was one thing Hart wanted more than anything: a PIAA title.
This past weekend, Hart capped a dream season with a 6-1 win over Kiski Area's Matt McCutcheon.
“This is quite an accomplishment,” Hampton coach Joe Bursick said. “Jake is my first wrestler to win at states, and he did a great job.”
Hart credited this season to the benefit of hard work.
“I beat him earlier in the week, and used some of the same stuff,” Hart said. “This is my biggest accomplishment in wrestling no doubt. It has been since 1993 when a Hampton wrestler had a similar season.”
Bursick said there was some method to his madness. The right recipe of practice, tapering and changing things up while trying to stick with what works was important to the success.
“The key was to stay intense, avoid injury and peak at the right time,” Bursick said.
Bursick said it took a long time to get to this point. Building a youth program with the help of two former wrestlers and getting the program firing on all cylinders at all levels with all the athletes is important. With Hart's success, a new mark has been set for all who come after him, Bursick said.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.