Local MMA fighter suffers setback
Lower Burrell MMA fighter Dominic “The Honey Badger” Mazzotta was eager to get back into the cage and fight after defeating Doug Hodges on Jan. 26 in his professional debut.
But his second fight will have to wait.
Mazzotta was scheduled to fight Jeremy Pender on April 20 in Canonsburg in the “Pinnacle Fighting Championship,” but Mazzotta is out four to six weeks with a knee injury.
Mazzotta tore his right meniscus last Wednesday while training for his current fight. According to Mazzotta, the injury occurred while he was wrestling with Isaac Greeley. Mazzotta said he was trying to get out of a single-leg takedown.
“I was screaming in pain and knew something was wrong when I couldn't move my knee, because it was locked,” Mazzotta said. “(Greeley) is a chiropractor, and he was able to unlock it a little bit. I told my mom that morning that I think my knee is going to go soon. I just hope it's after the fight.”
Mazzotta had meniscus issues in the past. He slightly tore the meniscus in August while training in Brazil. Then, a few weeks ago while he simply was walking up a flight of stairs, he reinjured it but was able to rehab to the point where he felt comfortable to compete.
The Pender fight likely will not be made up. Mazzotta's goal is to make a return July 20 at Stage AE for “Gladiators of the Cage.”
“I was disappointed and looking forward to this fight more than any fight I've ever had,” Mazzotta said. “I felt this was the best test for me.”
D.J. Vasil is a freelance writer.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.