Share This Page

Schneider shines in DNL pitching debut

| Thursday, June 20, 2013, 11:24 p.m.
Ronald Vezzani Jr. | Daily News
Harvey Wilner's Greg Schneider delivers a pitch against Carriage Inn on Thursday, June 20, 2013, at South Allegheny.

In baseball, sometimes the final score isn't a true indicator of how the game played out.

And sometimes, a pitching line doesn't accurately describe how dominant a hurler was.

Harvey Wilner's Tavern and Greg Schneider know all about that following a 6-3 Daily News League win over Carriage Inn on Thursday at South Allegheny.

Harvey's banged out 13 hits — but managed only six runs — and Schneider was his dominant self on the mound before a flurry seeing-eye singles and infield hits along with a couple misplayed balls in the last inning made the game appear much closer than it was.

“What are you going to do?” Harvey's coach Bob Kostelnik said. “We wanted to get everybody into the game and I put a pitcher at third base and things just didn't work out in that last inning. Still, we were able to win the game and that's all that matters.”

Schneider had plenty to do with that.

The former Pitt recruit, who led Thomas Jefferson deep into the WPIAL playoffs a year ago, was the difference. He went the distance, allowing seven hits — three infield singles, a bloop single and a seeing-eye single — while striking out eight in his DNL pitching debut. The only earned run the right-hander allowed came on a swinging bunt by Zac Grayson that scored Tyler Dillinger from second base with one out in the seventh.

“Their pitcher deserves all the credit in the world,” said Grayson, Carriage Inn's player/manager. “We just couldn't hit him. You need consistent at bats and be able to string together hits against him, and we weren't able to do that. We needed to get a couple hits and a bouncer here and there. It didn't happen.”

Schneider allowed four base runners through six innings and only one of those reached third.

“We knew we weren't going to need many runs with the way he was pitching,” Kostelnik said.

He was right.

Harvey had as many runs as it would need by the second inning.

Schneider's sacrifice fly in the first scored Don McDuffee, who led the game off with a triple. An RBI double by Jake Kostelnik followed by a run-scoring single by Anthony Defelipo made it 3-0 off Carriage Inn starter Joe Giles.

Sacrifice flies by Jon Corcoran and McDuffee, along with a RBI single by Brett Ferlic, gave Harvey's a 6-0 lead in the fifth. They had 12 hits by nine players.

“We got hits, but just not the key hits that would've broken the game open,” Kostelnik said.

Harvey's got two hits and an RBI each from Schneider, Ferlic and Defelipo. Six players knocked in runs for Harvey's.

Carriage Inn got a pair of hits from Dillinger and Grayson.

“We still don't have all our guys here, but we're playing well,” Kostelnik said. “We get everybody here and we are going to be tough to beat.”

Quinn Construction 3, Hot Shots Saloon 2 — Nick Yobbi threw out the tying run at the plate in the seventh inning to give the Mudcats (7-3) their sixth straight win. Jim Pasquine's RBI single with two outs in the sixth scored Ryan Kandsberger with the winning run. Pasquine pitched four innings in relief of Brandon Sandusky to pick up the win.

Mark Kaboly is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at mkaboly@tribweb.com or via Twitter @MarkKaboly_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.