Daily Courier roundup: Dunbar stays alive in tourney
Kade Musgrove hit a two-run homer, and Logan Kemp had two singles and drove in four runs as the Dunbar 9- and 10-year-old Little League All-Stars beat host Connellsville, 9-2, in District 9 Tournament action Friday.
Will Trimbath also had two singles for Dunbar. Musgrove struck out three and was the winning pitcher.
With the win, Dunbar remains alive in the tournament and will play at Mt. Pleasant at 2 p.m. Sunday.
Anthony Rowan tripled, singled and was the losing pitcher with five strikeouts for Connellsville. The loss eliminates Connellsville.
Rostraver 9, Bullskin 8 — Austin Petraglia knocked in two runs and had four hits, including a double, but the Bullskin 11- and 12-year-old Little League All-Stars were beaten by host Rostraver in a District 9 Tournament semifinal. Matt Lancaster had three singles and knocked in two runs. Caleb Dillon was the losing pitcher.
With the win, Rostraver advances and will host Yough in the championship game at 7 p.m. on Sunday.
The loss eliminates Bullskin.
Yough 11, Connellsville 4 — Cameron Sapola drove in a run with a triple, but the Connellsville 11- and 12-year-old Little League All-Stars were beaten by visiting Yough in a District 9 Tournament semifinal at Connellsville.
Gage Fuller was the losing pitcher.
Noah Virtes and Dom Koch each had two singles and a double for Yough. Dustin Schoaf had three singles, and Hunter Aaron tripled. Koch was the winning pitcher.
Yough will play at Rostraver in the championship game at 7 p.m. on Sunday. The loss eliminates Connellsville.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.