ShareThis Page

Greensburg's Kuzmkowski logs more than 2,000 miles in pool

| Thursday, Jan. 2, 2014, 8:55 p.m.

John Kuzmkowski has accomplished something he does not expect to repeat as a member of the U.S. Masters Swimming Go the Distance program at the Greensburg YMCA.

Kuzmkowski, 59, logged 2,215.63 miles in 2013, the most of all participants reported nationwide so far.

In the program, men and women 18 and older report, on an honor system, the distances they swim throughout the year. Results are listed online.

Swim caps, drawstring bags and swimsuits are awarded to swimmers reaching certain milestones.

“I'll never place first again,” Kuzmkowski, of Greensburg, said. “You must be married to the pool to win.

“I decided to push the number so far out, only a bigger (fool) would attempt to go that far.”

Of the 4,077 swimmers reported, Kuzmkowski was one of three logging 1,500 or more miles. Timothy J. Martin, 48, of Caltech Masters in Pasadena, Calif., ranked second (1,691.29).

Kuzmkowski, who swims at least three hours each day, plans to cut his distance this year.

“I'll probably scale back to 1,000-1,500 miles,” said Kuzmkowski, who began by swimming just 200 a decade ago.

Kuzmkowski said Jennifer Prohaska, senior program director at the Greensburg YMCA, has been good at finding him lanes in the pool.

“John is so sweet and has a very outgoing personality,” Prohaska said. “He greets everybody and is there long after they're gone.”

Kuzmkowksi, a roofing contractor, said his wife also has been understanding of his devotion to swimming.

Kuzmkowski's next major goal is to swim the English Channel.

Kuzmkowski (5 hours, 2 minutes and 28 seconds) finished third in the Solo Male Swimmers Wave 2 division at the annual Swim Around Key West event in Florida last June.

Karen Kadilak is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.