Kovacevic: Time to go, Mr. Commissioner
By Dejan Kovacevic
Published: Thursday, December 6, 2012, 10:56 p.m.
Updated: Friday, December 7, 2012
NEW YORK — My question for Gary Bettman was, in comparison to the mega-mess just made of the NHL's labor talks Thursday night, a fairly simple one.
Here it is verbatim: "Gary, how could any commissioner justify canceling two full seasons in a span of eight years in any major professional sport?"
You had to be an elementary school principal to truly grasp the glare shot across the media room at the Westin Times Square.
"First of all," Bettman began, "lockouts and strikes happen in all sports. Baseball had eight work stoppages in a row before they had labor peace. The NBA and NFL have had them, too."
That's when he tilted his head a bit, always a sign he's about to get testy, his left eye twitched, his left handed pointed and trembled, and he added: "I'm not happy about this. But I've got to play the hand that I'm dealt."
Let's hit pause for a second.
This man had just presided over the complete collapse of three days of negotiating that involved all 30 franchise owners, 18 players and countless lawyers, amid make-or-break urgency.
This man had just watched all the owners who employ him bolt town in disgust all through the afternoon, including the Penguins' would-be cavalry of Mario Lemieux and Ron Burkle he'd personally invited to seal the deal here
This man had just moved a step closer to shutting down his sport at a rate unprecedented in history.
And this man, entrusted with more power than anyone in the equation, feels it's just the hand he's been dealt.
Plain old lousy luck.
You know, I can't say what will become of this NHL season. It's never looked as dark as it did here Thursday night, but things can change with a single phone call, text or email. The part of me that's loved hockey all my life wants to believe it will be back.
But I do feel wholly certain of this much: If there is a hockey season of any length or breadth, it will be very much in spite of the men running the sport.
Check that: The man running it.
Let me put it another way: Bettman needs to go.
Not soon, but right now.
That's not to let Fehr off the hook. His reputation as a man solely interested in the advance of labor, even at the expense of the athletes he serves, was never more glaring than Thursday. The owners made a fair offer, and sentiment was nearly universal that a deal would be achieved before the weekend. Be very sure it was Fehr that pulled the plug.
At the same time, it's just impossible to get past that the man running the sport also has done a bang-up job of ruining it.
It's not something one writes cavalierly and, trust me, I'm not. If it weren't for Bettman, the league might never have been built into a $3.3 billion business, installed a salary cap, become vital in places like Tampa and Dallas, raised the Stanley Cup in Raleigh or Anaheim, brought Canadian markets back to health and the Jets back to Winnipeg, and taken on bold efforts such as Olympic participation and the Winter Classic.
Oh, and your Penguins would have skated off to Kansas City.
Give Bettman credit for that much. For the body of two decades, he's been a good commissioner.
But that's what makes this disastrous lockout — the third in his 19-year tenure, possibly the second to cost a full season — all the more damaging to his brand. He built all this up, only to tear it all down in one abysmal year.
Forget for a moment, if you can, the lockout's impact on Pittsburgh, where it's not only shut down a potentially great team but also costs the local economy $1.2 million per lost home game and many good folks in our region an honest paycheck.
Look, strictly from the NHL standpoint, at Los Angeles.
The Kings play in our nation's second-largest market, blessed with as much potential as any franchise to take hockey to the next level. The last time we saw the sport in action, Bettman was passing the Cup to team captain Dustin Brown, the team was applauded later that week by 50,000-plus at Dodger Stadium, then made the full-circuit of late-night TV.
And now, just like that, to far too many in that same public, the Kings are right back to being Arena Football.
Think about that. What an enormous lost opportunity.
Only Bettman was in position to avoid that and all the rest.
Yes, in theory, he does the owners' bidding. And yes, the owners had — and still have — legitimate concerns. But thanks to an edict pushed through in 2002 to grant himself far more power, the commissioner needs only eight teams' approval to take action — work stoppages included - well down from three-quarters.
Don't think Bettman could have found eight teams opposed to a lockout?
I'll start with Pittsburgh, Los Angeles, the $1 billion Maple Leafs, the Rangers who are headquartered a block away from these meetings but conspicuously weren't invited, and four more are easy.
Even once the lockout train got rolling, Bettman bungled step after step. Facing a union clearly open to concessions, his initial approach this summer was a we-want-it-all that galvanized the players around Fehr and killed any chance for a quick deal. Strike two came when Bettman assembled 5-6 hard-line owners - led by the Bruins' Jeremy Jacobs - to keep going ballistic and further bury the process.
And here these past couple days, Bettman was a shameful no-show. That started with keeping himself out of the most successful meeting Tuesday — along with Fehr — and continued Thursday when he stayed out in the hall while deputy commissioner Bill Daly and counsel Bob Batterman met with Fehr and the union.
How humiliating that must have been.
"It was a simple yes-or-no approach on our part," Bettman offered unsolicited, as if to fend it off. "We didn't feel the need to match lines, so to speak."
It'll be 20 years for Bettman in February, and that's too long. No matter the outcome of all this, it's time for change.
The owners should immediately consider John Collins, the league's sharp, young chief operating officer who came from the NFL and conceived the Winter Classic, struck the 10-year deal with NBC and softened the league's touch with social media and young fans. Word is, Collins is so upset with the lockout and what's become of his achievements that he's considering leaving the league.
Here's another chance for Bettman to be proactive. One can only hope, for the sake of all of us who love this magnificent game, that he doesn't blow this one, too.
- Kovacevic: It doesn’t have to be this hard
- Steelers rookie moves on after PSU scandal
- Mt. Washington’s Grandview Avenue isn’t looking so great these days
- ACC-bound Pitt finds itself without natural football rivals
- Penguins blow late lead, fall to Senators in 2OT
- Steelers might be looking at a youth movement in 2013
- Former Charleroi pastor indicted on child pornography charge
- Trib poll: Peduto pulling ahead in Pittsburgh mayor’s race
- I-70 to reopen after crash in Westmoreland
- Police: Man escapes car hit by train in East Deer
- Penguins notebook: Vitale a no-go
You must be signed in to add comments
To comment, click the Sign in or sign up at the very top of this page.
Hey, guys, the focus of the piece is on Bettman's 20-year tenure as commissioner. It's not about assigning blame for which way things shifted last week or even in the last month (although I understand that's most folks' favorite talking point right now). It's about the commissioner, period. Not because I was assigning blame, but because he's the commissioner, and I was looking at how he's done on the job.
Submitted by: charles on Monday, December 10, 2012
As a Trib subscriber, I have long been a fan of the writing of Mr. Kovacevic, and have appreciated his insight for being well thought-out and enlightening. This article, however, is almost unacceptable. Placing the onus on Gary Bettman for the current status of this collective bargaining process is misleading. We need look no further than the recent, and highly unusual, prepared statement from Ron Burkle addressing his frustrations with the Players' Association. Although brief, it spoke volumes about the current state of negotiations. Had this release come forth from any other owner, it would be taken with a grain of salt, but not from the only owner within the NHL who has made his fortune almost exclusively by negotiating contracts with unions whose actions had precluded investiture from otherwise capable businesses. It is moreso illustrative that, in his statement, Mr. Burkle indicates that negotiations, had, in fact, moved backward after the inclusion of the full staff of the players' association and subsequent offer submitted by the union representation. Not only is this entirely contradictory to the statement released by the players' association alluding that an agreement had almost been reached, but it is also the stance of the owner who would be most willing to negotiate in good faith in terms of player interest. It is only safe to assume that the position of the other owners would be much more austere in terms of concessions than that of Mr. Burkle. First and foremost, Gary Bettman is a mouthpiece of the owners, and I would argue that Mr. Kovacevic has both overestimated Gary Bettman's influence over his employers as well as inappropriately described the positions of the owners themselves.
Submitted by: Gene on Friday, December 7, 2012
Owners, Bettman, Fehr - all egotistical maniacs! Except of course the Penguins.
Submitted by: Randy on Friday, December 7, 2012
This is an unfair representation of the situation. This is by no means all Bettman's fault. I know we all want to blame someone but come on now. The author can scapegoat Bettman if he wants but we all know that the author is showing his bias as an NHL fan here. I want to watch hockey as much as the next guy but the deal has to be fair on both sides or we will be right back here again in a few years.