ShareThis Page

Kovacevic: Pirates just might have what 'it' takes

| Sunday, Oct. 6, 2013, 10:45 p.m.
Pirates pinch-runner Josh Harrison scores in the eighth inning against the Cardinals on Sunday, Oct. 6, 2013 in Game 3 of the National League Division Series at PNC Park.
Philip G. Pavely | Tribune-Review
Pirates pinch-runner Josh Harrison scores in the eighth inning against the Cardinals on Sunday, Oct. 6, 2013 in Game 3 of the National League Division Series at PNC Park.

In the generationally groundbreaking book “Moneyball,” Billy Beane, the chief protagonist and general manager of the Athletics, postulates that the playoffs are all luck.

He actually uses much more colorful language — his Oakland teams tend to stink up their Octobers — but he boils it down to this: One team benefits from luck, the other can't touch it, and the playoff clock expires before the cosmos can restore the rightful balance.

It's kind of a fun theory, if nothing else, and one I've long filtered when watching any playoff in any sport.

But now … man, is it too early to postulate that these Pirates just might have this something special, this mythical momentum?

Do they have that it factor?

Don't misunderstand: It would take a fool not to see the talent they've got, the will, the camaraderie. As I wrote out in St. Louis, these aren't some cute, cuddly overachievers.

At the same time, when you take a step back from the Pirates' 5-3 triumph-of-will victory over the Cardinals in Game 3 of the National League Division Series, when you set aside the delirium of another manic gathering of 40,489 at PNC Park, when you shove off even that thrilling thought of being one W shy of the pennant round … it's hard not to see it taking shape.

Know what it looks like?

It's Russell Martin, owner of one sac fly in two years, facing Seth Maness, who hadn't allowed a sac fly in 2013 and had given up only 22 fly balls, with a 2-2 tie in the sixth.

And Martin hits a sac fly.

It's Clint Hurdle lifting his defensive whiz, Clint Barmes, for a pinch hitter with a one-run lead in the sixth inning, setting up a defensive downgrade at shortstop the rest of the way with Jordy Mercer.

And on St. Louis' very next at-bats, Mercer makes a slick scoop on a Jon Jay shot up the middle.

Little stuff, you know?

And it would only blossom.

Fast-forward to the fateful eighth, when Mark Melancon was tagged for a Carlos Beltran blast that tied the score 3-3, then Andrew McCutchen led off the bottom half with a double only to be unwisely thrown out at third on a grounder to the left side.

For those few minutes, it felt like the old St. Louis dynamic, and if you're a longtime season-ticket holder who was there, you know what I mean: The Cardinals would school their weakling cousins on fundamentals and prevail, as has happened time and again for … oh, a couple decades now.

Mike Matheny observed that play from the manager's stoop in the visiting dugout and saw it — his words — as “a major momentum shift.”


Carlos Martinez, the Cardinals' flamethrowing righty, came soft at fastball-feasting Marlon Byrd, opening with six curves. The count was full before Martinez brought the heat, and 100 mph at that.

Byrd fouled it off. Maybe the swing of the game.

“Just happy I got a bat on it,” he'd recall later. “That guy was bringing it.”

Martinez brought another curve, and Byrd walked.

“Tremendous at-bat by Marlon,” Hurdle called it.

Pedro Alvarez was next, and he'd top it. Matheny turned to his best lefty, Kevin Siegrist. Alvarez had a .180 average against lefties, and Siegrist had held opponents to an absurd .118 figure.

Siegrist wanted to work Alvarez hard and away, and he succeeded at both, with 95 mph on the outer half … except that Alvarez somehow reached out and pulled the ball through the right side for the decisive RBI single.

“I wanted a ground ball and got it,” Siegrist would shrug.

“I was able to make good contact on the ball and drive it into right field,” Alvarez would shrug as well.

None of this is new, of course. We've marveled all summer at the Pirates' resiliency. But never had we seen it play out on a stage like this, with higher hopes attached to what it could mean if it keeps playing through October.

“It's probably … you know, we've been down a few times this year, and we've been able to battle back,” Martin offered by way of his own postulation. “When you do that, you start gaining confidence. So sure, definitely, the confidence level is high. And the stakes couldn't be any higher, so we're having fun with it.”

Yeah, that's about it.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.