ShareThis Page

Kovacevic: These Steelers better than those Steelers

| Saturday, Nov. 23, 2013, 7:15 p.m.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers linebacker Jason Worilds sacks Lions quarterback Matthew Stafford in the third quarter Sunday, Nov. 17, 2013, at Heinz Field.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Steelers cornerback William Gay breaks up a pass intended for Lions receiver Kevin Ogletree during the fourth quarter Sunday, Nov. 17, 2013, at Heinz Field.

With apologies to Dennis Green, it's possible these 2013 Steelers aren't who we thought they were.

Or even who they thought they were.

Yeah, there's been a ton of debate and dissection over how they've been able to dig out from an 0-4 hole to play an honest-to-Kosar-and-Sipe important game in Cleveland on this particular Sunday. But most of that discussion has centered on strategy and execution. They're going no-huddle more often. They're deploying six defensive backs. They're just making the plays, doing what they're supposed to do. That sort of thing.

What about personnel?

Couldn't it be the case — maybe the main case — that the players this management and coaching staff thought were their best coming out of Latrobe really weren't?

I'd say so when looking at the upgrades made at a quarter of the roster's 24 starting spots …

Velasco > Pouncey

It's been heresy to knock Maurkice Pouncey since the first drill of his first camp, but he was graded by Pro Football Focus as no higher than the NFL's 12th-best center in 2012, and, more to the point, he's been brittle.

Whether he can do the job isn't the issue. It's getting it done.

Fernando Velasco has done it. He has been solid from his first snap despite coming in cold as a free agent after Pouncey was lost for the season in the opener. Velasco provided immediate stability, he's only gotten stronger, and the Steelers are the better for it.

Beachum > Adams

Anyone who saw the Vikings' Jared Allen manhandle Mike Adams in London knows that starting Adams at a critical position like left tackle was a near-fatal mistake. And by that I mean Ben Roethlisberger is lucky to be breathing.

It was a mistake not only starting Adams but also switching sides between him and Marcus Gilbert in the spring. Both were at least OK where they were.

Kelvin Beachum hasn't made anyone forget the prime version of Max Starks — six sacks allowed in six starts — but he's improved with each week, which is to be expected for essentially learning on the job.

Cotchery > Sanders

Before the season, I'd expressed hope that another wide receiver would push 31-year-old Jerricho Cotchery off the field.

Man, talk about a dropped ball.

Cotchery hasn't just fended off rookie Markus Wheaton, but he also has surpassed Emmanuel Sanders, New England's fling last summer, as the clear No. 2 on the depth chart under Antonio Brown.

Check out this efficiency: Cotchery has caught 34 of 49 passes sent his way, a terrific 69 percent. More impressive, seven have gone for touchdowns to lead the team, and 29 catches — all but five! — have brought first downs.

Heyward > Hood

It's taken Cam Heyward three years — far too long — to deliver his expected impact at defensive end, but he has been the starter since Week 6, and that's on merit. No one has been more disruptive in the backfield.

He bumped Ziggy Hood off the field to start, but he's also outperformed Brett Keisel in every regard.

It's Heyward's time, and it's about time.

Gay > Allen

Think management isn't wondering whether letting Keenan Lewis walk to the Saints — for whom he's been quite good — was a mistake?

Cortez Allen was supposed to take over at corner for Lewis, maybe even add a takeaway dimension. But all that was taken away was his starting job, by the veteran William Gay. Gay has had wild swings, sure, but he has allowed fewer catches, yards and touchdowns than the other starting corner, Ike Taylor, in just 63 fewer snaps.

It's not ideal for the future, but it's made this team better.

Worilds > Woodley

This one, I'm guessing, will set off the most alarms, but how to avoid it?

Never mind that LaMarr Woodley is almost incessantly hurt, including the calf injury that has him listed as questionable for this game. That's maddening enough for a player not yet halfway through a six-year, $61.5 million contract.

What's most striking is what we saw last Sunday against the Detroit Lions, when Jason Worilds, taking Woodley's place at left outside linebacker, registered eight tackles, a sack and four quarterback hits. In general, Worilds did things athletically — spin moves, in particular — that we haven't seen from Woodley in more than two years.

In the middle of this week, Worilds acknowledged being more comfortable on the left side than his usual right, which raised a couple of decidedly un-comfortable follow-up questions for both.

Hey, no need to tiptoe here. Plain and simple, successful teams put their best players in the places they belong.

Let's not overthink how the Steelers suddenly are competitive again.

Dejan Kovacevic is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @Dejan_Kovacevic.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.