Share This Page

Starkey: Orpik was one of a kind

| Wednesday, July 2, 2014, 3:55 p.m.

On the weirdness-in-Washington scale, nothing could top Jaromir Jagr in a Capitals jersey. That was downright frightening.

Brooks Orpik wearing Capitals “44” will come close, though, won't it? Especially when he walks through the tunnel with Alex Ovechkin, who played Ali to Orpik's Frazier all these years.

These guys hated each other's guts on the ice. Now they're sharing laughs. Ovechkin checked in with a congratulatory call Tuesday, a few hours after the Cash-itals signed Orpik to a mind-blowing contract (five years, $27.5 million).

“I just talked to him an hour ago,” Orpik told me late Tuesday night. “He called from Russia. He was saying, ‘It'll be a lot better on both our bodies if we don't have to play against each other.' He got a good laugh out of that. It's definitely different.”

And definitely strange. Which follows the pattern of a surreal offseason in these parts. Who better than Orpik — the most consistently blunt athlete I've covered — to assess the revolution in Penguins country?

“I think everybody knew change was coming by the way we lost the last few years,” he said. “I think it was inevitable, and you know what? You can't really argue with it. The definition of insanity, as people say, is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.”

Besides never blinking (he didn't blink once in 11 years), Orpik was The Defenseman Who Could Not Tell a Lie from the minute he walked through the door. After an early demotion, for example, he let the media know he should not have been the one sent down.

He was right, too.

“I've probably been too honest at times,” he said, laughing. “It's a fine line.”

Yes it is, just like winning and losing at playoff time. Orpik has experienced plenty of both. And again, he does not mince words in assessing the Penguins' recent failures.

“We knew we blew some pretty good opportunities with the rosters Ray Shero put together for us,” he said.

Orpik doesn't necessarily agree with new GM Jim Rutherford's assessment that louder voices are needed in the Penguins' room.

“It'd be difficult for him to have a pulse on that,” Orpik said. “Somebody else must have conveyed that to him. I think leadership comes in a lot of different ways. I'm different than Sid. Sid is different than Chris Kunitz. Nobody's going to be Bill Guerin or Gary Roberts. Everybody's their own guy.”

He continued. Bluntly, of course.

“I think it was more that we let the pressure get to us. There were just so many expectations, both internally and externally. I think we stopped having fun, to be honest with you. We let the external pressure seep into the room. That's the one thing I could put my finger on. I'm sure Sid and Geno and the other guys will learn from it.”

Orpik played 703 regular-season games here, more than any defenseman in Penguins history and fifth overall on the franchise list. He saved his finest work for the playoffs.

Exhibit A: “The Shift” against Detroit in the 2008 Stanley Cup Final, when Orpik began shooting down Red Wings like clay pigeons.

His top three memories:

1. Winning the Cup in Detroit. Orpik registered game highs of nine hits and five blocked shots in Game 7.

2. Getting drafted back-to-back with former Boston College teammate Krys Kolanos in 2000. The Penguins brilliantly snagged Orpik 18th overall. Ten of the 13 players drafted directly in front of him did not play even two full seasons.

3. Playing his first NHL game: Dec. 10, 2002, against Toronto.

Orpik wore No. 29 that night. His teammates included the iconic Mario Lemieux and the anemic Alexandre Daigle (not to mention Ross Lupaschuk and Michal Sivek).

Who could forget that Orpik was part of the Penguins' ill-fated X Generation? He'd like to.

“I was there for some of the lean times,” he said.

Nobody would describe these as lean times for Orpik. He took a hometown discount on his last deal. This time, it was necessary for both sides to move on.

Advanced analytics would have you believe Orpik, who turns 34 in September, will show up in D.C. using a walker. I'm thinking differently. It was only two seasons ago that he led the team's defensemen in hits and blocks, finished plus-17 and helped rejuvenate Paul Martin's sagging career. Ask Martin about that.

It was only a few months ago that Orpik torpedoed Jonathan Toews. The man can still bring it when needed.

He brought it here for 11 years.

Joe Starkey co-hosts a show 2 to 6 p.m. weekdays on 93.7 FM. Reach him at jraystarkey@gmail.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.